this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
94 points (100.0% liked)

Climate Crisis, Biosphere & Societal Collapse

1477 readers
357 users here now

A place to share news, experiences and discussion about the continuing climate crisis, societal collapse, and biosphere collapse. Please be respectful of each other and remember the human.

Long live the Lützerath Mud Wizard.

Useful Links:

DISCORD - Collapse

Earth - A Global Map of Wind, Weather and Ocean Conditions - Use the menu at bottom left to toggle different views. For example, you can see where wildfires/smoke are by selecting "Chem - COsc" to see carbon monoxide (CO) surface concentration.

Climate Reanalyzer (University of Maine) - A source for daily updated average global air temps, sea surface temps, sea ice, weather and more.

National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center (US) - Information about ENSO and weather predictions.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Global Temperature Rankings Outlook (US) - Tool that is updated each month, concurrent with the release of the monthly global climate report.

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System - Government of Canada

Surging Seas Risk Zone Map - For discovering which areas could be underwater soon.

Check out our sister sub for collapse-related memes and silly stuff, Faster Than Expected!
AKA
c/fte@supoli.xyz

Alternative community on Reddthat

If there are any links you think are important that should be added to the list, please send a message and let me know.

Thanks for coming to c/collapse!

This is a supoli.xyz community.
SUPOLI GENERAL RULES:

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Supoli FAQ

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The new study, published in Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, looked at medical records for more than 3,000 children born in Colorado between 1992 and 2019. The researchers found that children who were diagnosed with leukemia between the ages of two and nine were more than twice as likely to live within five kilometers — about three miles — of dense oil and gas development compared to healthy children. The study also found that Children who’d been diagnosed with leukemia during this time period were between 1.4 and 2.64 times more likely to live within 13 kilometers (about eight miles) of dense oil and gas development.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What makes them move there, do you think?

[–] madeinthebackseat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Their parents have jobs in the region?

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sorry, I wasn't being serious. The title kinda makes it sound like they live there because they have leukemia instead of having leukemia because they live there.

[–] solo@piefed.social 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

In that case, adding /s at the end of the comment helps a lot to clarify its tone

[–] warbond@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

The comment was intended to make people think, "This idiot..." It really was a stupid question.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's got to be the most American thing I've seen today.

"Why them stupid kids be breathing in the fumes, did noone ever teach them to hold their breath? Serves'em right. Bet they also be drinking that tap water, filled with the chemicals."

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 hours ago

It was a joke, hoss

[–] SebaDC@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Ducking mandatory vaccination! /s

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Considering they've got leukemia, that can't be good for them. They should really think about moving. /s

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because the solution to massively polluting industries is to give way and move out, right...??

God forbid somebody actually regulates them properly so they are held responsible for their fallout.

Perhaps then they would actually use some of that obscene profits to offset their negative impact, instead of buying social media "counter-ops".

[–] Tower@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That was supposed to be a joke conflating cause and effect.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I suggest you add an /s, because otherwise it reads like an oil shill...