this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

Climate Crisis, Biosphere & Societal Collapse

1469 readers
108 users here now

A place to share news, experiences and discussion about the continuing climate crisis, societal collapse, and biosphere collapse. Please be respectful of each other and remember the human.

Long live the Lützerath Mud Wizard.

Useful Links:

DISCORD - Collapse

Earth - A Global Map of Wind, Weather and Ocean Conditions - Use the menu at bottom left to toggle different views. For example, you can see where wildfires/smoke are by selecting "Chem - COsc" to see carbon monoxide (CO) surface concentration.

Climate Reanalyzer (University of Maine) - A source for daily updated average global air temps, sea surface temps, sea ice, weather and more.

National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center (US) - Information about ENSO and weather predictions.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) Global Temperature Rankings Outlook (US) - Tool that is updated each month, concurrent with the release of the monthly global climate report.

Canadian Wildland Fire Information System - Government of Canada

Surging Seas Risk Zone Map - For discovering which areas could be underwater soon.

Check out our sister sub for collapse-related memes and silly stuff, Faster Than Expected!
AKA
c/fte@supoli.xyz

Alternative community on Reddthat

If there are any links you think are important that should be added to the list, please send a message and let me know.

Thanks for coming to c/collapse!

This is a supoli.xyz community.
SUPOLI GENERAL RULES:

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar whackos and no endorsement of them
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam
  6. No content against Finnish law

Supoli FAQ

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It sounds like this is still at the R&D stage, not something we can count on today. This further reinforce the impression that most carbon credits are worthless and/or oversold.

DAC might contribute one day a little bit to fighting climate change, maybe. Don't hold your breath.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Is reforestation not simply the best way to do this?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

In a very limited fashion it is. You can plant a forest and that amount of CO2 is what it'll be able to pick up. Trees will die, rot, emit their CO2 back into the air while new trees pick it up again. The system would reach a maximum equilibrium quickly and the relative amount of CO2 picked up isn't that high.

Most CO2 is actually processed by algae anyway

[–] gens@programming.dev 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Then cut the tree and trow it in a cave or something.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

that's a way to replenish petroleum

Pretty sure that was the unsaid core of the idea from the get-go

[–] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago (5 children)

If we stop emitting greenhouse gases nothing will get better, it will just stop getting worse. We also have to remove all the GHG that we put into the atmosphere.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 20 points 1 day ago

"Stop getting worse" is a pretty major improvement. And yes, trees work as carbon sequestration.

Most (all?) CCS is not grabbing random carbon from the atmosphere. It's pulling it out of smokestacks so you can keep burning fuel while claiming it's green. It is not net negative even if working as intended.

[–] Oddbin@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Removing the GHG needs to be done but this is not how you do that. This is a way to say "look, we're trying so just let us take another hit of that sweet sweet crude OK?"

Plant trees. Simple.

Let the systems balance themselves out. Simple. Not fun but Simple.

CCS for industrial processes and that might one day be good enough to work on a global scale? Maybe but that's fucking ages away and it's certainly not this.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's no amount of trees you can plant to actually put that genie back in the bottle in a reasonable timeframe. Consider how much highly concentrated plant matter we've dug up and then imagine how much we'd have to bury. We could spend centuries doing nothing but planting trees and cutting them down and burying them and still wouldn't make up that deficit.

[–] django@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Better start soon then.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Stopping it from getting worse is like half the work of controlling climate change, and restoring biodiversity is the way of removing GHG from the atmosphere, not silicon valley techno bro fans

[–] alaphic@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Which - barring a sudden, rapid series of unprecedented technological advances in our ability to manage the chemical composition of our atmosphere - is the rough equivalent of saying, "unexplode this bomb"

[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

If these guys did it right, and they haven't, they have been right in that we also need to remove a shit ton of co2 from the atmosphere again and continue removing to compensate for unavoidable emissions, ALONGSIDE absolutely reducing and avoiding more emissions. But they fucked it up by becoming a bunch of greedy techbros that started selling shit they don't have, are not producing, and know they will never be able to produce. It's not just greenwashing, it's downright fraud.