this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
865 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

71365 readers
3598 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube pulled a popular tutorial video from tech creator Jeff Geerling this week, claiming his guide to installing LibreELEC on a Raspberry Pi 5 violated policies against "harmful content." The video, which showed viewers how to set up their own home media servers, had been live for over a year and racked up more than 500,000 views. YouTube's automated systems flagged the content for allegedly teaching people "how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content."

Geerling says his tutorial covered only legal self-hosting of media people already own -- no piracy tools or copyright workarounds. He said he goes out of his way to avoid mentioning popular piracy software in his videos. It's the second time YouTube has pulled a self-hosting content video from Geerling. Last October, YouTube removed his Jellyfin tutorial, though that decision was quickly reversed after appeal. This time, his appeal was denied.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml 72 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Notably, Youtube does not consider exploiting children for profit harmful.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Because there is profit in child exploitation.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 15 points 5 days ago

Harmful is just code for "threatens the bottom line of multibillion dollar companies". There is no relation to anything that matters to real people.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I made a very similar joke like this on Reddit, except it was about Waymo, and Reddit issued a warning against my account threatening a permanent ban.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Let them. Trust me, you'll feel much better

[–] TheGreenWizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

Everyone who is capable of hosting a peertube instance should do so, even if it's just to host your own content. I know, "it will never replace youtube" but if as many people as possible use it and share bandwidth between each other we will at least have SOMETHING in terms of a youtube alternative.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Maybe stop relying on fucking youtube?

[–] itslola@lemmy.world 20 points 5 days ago

Who, Jeff? He made a whole video a while back about how he doesn't rely on YouTube, and is also on Floatplane. However, he acknowledges that a lot of viewers can't afford a subscription service, and YT has a massive reach, so he still uploads there, too.

[–] Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 6 days ago

Are you suggesting that a guide on how to leave youtube should be elsewhere?

Thats like requiring to pass an exam to get access to the textbook.

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 days ago

Gotta preach where the choir is.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

JG can also be found on Floatplane.

[–] nibbler@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

you say in the video that you use this setup to watch YouTube. I love watching YouTube with Kodi as it shows no ads. I guess they don't love that.

I'm not saying that justifies the strike, but it might be connected

[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 5 days ago

I love watching YouTube with Kodi as it shows no ads. I guess they don’t love that.

This scene from A Clockwork Orange is how I view Google's attitude of entitlement when it comes to exposing people to ads.

No sir, you don't have the freedom to decide what gets displayed on your screens and even if you don't block ads, you must not ignore them or put the volume on mute while they play.

Are those ads promoting scams? Are those ads delivering malware to your computer? Stiff shit buddy! You must view the ads.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Didn't they recently greenlight adblocker advertising?

[–] oz1sej@feddit.dk 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The video is up again:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hFas54xFtg

But at some point, he shows he's moving some files to LibreELEC, and he has a folder called "Chernobyl" - how can that possibly be legal, if the folder actually contains files with the HBO show of the same name? Just asking because I'm curious 😊

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 33 points 6 days ago (3 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_(miniseries)

It was released on DVD and Blu-ray, if he purchased the disc and ripped it to his media, and hasn't shared those files with anyone, then it is legal, as an exception to copyright in the US, where Jeff and Google are both based.

Jeff has stated on multiple occasions that he purchases and rips his media, and does not use piracy.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Also like… you can legally just name your file wtf ever you want, I can make a folder full of pics of my dogs and name it “Chernobyl” it’s not illegal to use a word to name a file

[–] oz1sej@feddit.dk 6 points 6 days ago

Ah - didn't know it had been released on physical media.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 5 points 5 days ago

It is probably just a video he's making about how to self-host a 3GW nuclear power station, so that you can self-host a hundred million raspberry pi cluster.

[–] Mio@feddit.nu 12 points 6 days ago

You don't know the exact content of the files. He did not show those vidoeclips. I dont know if you can buy that or not. Sure it can be indication but in general you dont know as it varies between video to video if it is possible to buy.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 161 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This kind of crap is driving popular creators, like Geerling, to move to other places. YT / Alphabet has lost the plot.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

I tried a couple of other platforms but I keep running into a moderation issue where the other platforms market to the sort of people who would be permanently banned from YouTube.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 60 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Yep. Most of my favorite creators are on Nebula now.

The ones that aren't get watched on SmartTube or in Brave Browser.

[–] brachiosaurus@mander.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

Nebula

Closed source, centralized and not even free...

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Sue YouTube. They won't change meaningfully until forced to.

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago

I think what you mean to say is that we should be pressuring public officials to try to bust up Google's monopoly on many things. And we are doing that, and it is showing some progress. But there is much more work to be done.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 82 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Sue for defamation that Youtube are alleging he is promoting criminal activity of piracy.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 75 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

“how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content.”

In the future, public domain media will be banned for harming corporate profits.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In the 1970s/80s, the corporations just taxed blank media - because it was obviously used to pirate their warez.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

70s? ~~My government~~ the private for-profit corporation tasked by my government to manage copyrights, every year still steals from everyone millions of euro "because that phone can be used to watch pirated content"

We pay 7 euro on each smartphone, 7.50 on each USB drive, up to 18 euro on each internal drive (sata or name, but under 160gb is free) and products are castrated with regional firmware because if it's just a TV then it's 4 euro tax, but if it allows recording it's the 5% of MSRP

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

7.50 on each USB drive

Ouch!

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

It depends by the size (smaller is less taxed), but the law is old and it's exempt only if under 1gb

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Pretty sure you also had to pay royalties fees for radio/Internet radio regardless of where or not you played their music.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 6 days ago

And still do for live performance by cover bands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 week ago

They are so pissed that we dare own anything. Fuck corpos.

load more comments
view more: next ›