this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
517 points (99.6% liked)

Music

9452 readers
54 users here now

↳ Our family Communities:

➰#Music

Music.world - !music@lemmy.world

Jazz -!jazz@lemmy.world

Album Art Porn - !albumartporn@lemmy.world

Fake Album Covers - !fakealbumcovers@lemm.ee

Obscure Music - !ObscureMusic@lemm.ee

Vinyl and LP's - !vinyl@lemmy.world

Electronic Dance Music - !edm@reddthat.com

60's Music - !60smusic@lemmy.world

70's Music - !70smusic@lemmy.world

80's Music - !80smusic@lemmy.world

90's Music - !90smusic@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 110 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My dude, you aren't suing a small blogger, but an evil corporation worth over $1.5 trillion. Aim higher!

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 106 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't think he needs the money. This seems more like a cut that shit out and start the ball rolling for everyone else to sue.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 57 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He doesn't, but evil corporations only respond to one thing: money.

The more you can take from them, the more it hurts them. They already do it to us, including ripping off his songs, so fight back if you have the money to spend on lawyers!

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Yes, a lawsuit, a fine, etc are all "cost of doing business." If it costs a million dollars a year to use eminem's music, but engages 150 million of their 2 billion users into engagement and ad revenue that nets 50 million dollars, it was a very lucrative payment to eminem, and now they will certainly be willing to do the same for other popular artists at that price point.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Maybe it's just the actual damages.

Suing in America is funny because they always want as much as possible.

[–] meliodas_101@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why is everyone focusing on the number. It's going to set the record that artist's can sue corporate for using their work unfairly.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Been going after individual users long enough I guess

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The number is probably set just high enough to force meta to respond with lawyers who have an actual payroll. $1M is nothing, but if they roll over, then every other artist will do the same. Meta will need to fight this in courts. It will cost them money to do so.

Eminem can make an album about it afterwards. And he doesn't look super greedy. And other artists might win because of him.

[–] grillme@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago

It says statutory right in the article. $150k seems like the legal limit per song.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I’d be disappointed if he didn’t make a record after it.

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Exceed $1 Million

That is effectively pocket change to both parties. This isn't about money, but the legal precedent.

[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Wow, a WHOLE million? They're sure to learn their lesson.

/s, just in case.

[–] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

You dont just get to decide how much to sue for (well, you can try but good luck if there's no base for your number)

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The article says that Meta claims they got the rights through some third party firm that, his publisher claims had no right to authorize the distribution of their music. If that turns out to be the case, I wonder how many of the other artists that you can choose when you want to make a Reel or whatever also would fall under this same circumstance?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Hey, you wanna license the Beatles? I'm your guy

$3.50 a pop.

[–] Reckless_Moose@ttrpg.network 24 points 3 days ago

Well it was about that time that I noticed that the Beetles Agent was about 8 stories tall and a crustacean from the protozoic era

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

Throw in a couple of Nirvana tracks and you got yourself a deal

[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 22 points 3 days ago

Hell yeah, get their asses Slim!

[–] ChocoboEnthusiast@leminal.space 27 points 3 days ago

I imagine this more about starting a precedent in the courts to sue Meta over IP. Eminem doesn't need the money, but he needs meta to not steal what doesn't belong to them.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

Meta: "Ooooooh! A whole million dollars!"

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that's how much Zuckerberg tips the person who washes his testicles for him.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

Testiclean is a wholly owned subordinate of Meta. He doesn't tip.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[–] Gryficowa@szmer.info 2 points 2 days ago
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

A million.

Cost of doing business for them. They won't even blink.

[–] Ignot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is that Eminem Che Guevara?

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

it's his new look since around 2016ish. I've gotten quite used to it, actually, and I think it fits him quite a bit

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 3 days ago

If I just saw him out of the corner of my eye, I would think it's actually Justin Timberlake.

[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Did he forget how to spell billions?

[–] Damage@feddit.it -2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He looks fucking weird, is it the plastic surgery?

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Nah, it's the weird beard

~this~ ~is~ ~a~ ~reference~

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago

why you yellin at the mic

[–] 474D@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

He's a grandfather now, people age. This isn't slim shady

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

that's called facial hair.