this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Science

3155 readers
1 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a chemist scary terms like "forever chemicals" rub me the wrong way. Just speak openly about what the research says.

The vast majority of research gets zero press coverage, regardless of how relevant it may be to the public. Even within science you're rolling the dice whether you'll get any citations 5 years down the line.

The current media machine is only able to sustain headlines that exaggerate or "overhype" the findings of studies anyway. Let alone the amount of research out there that can't be reproduced, or has falsified data, or itself is exaggerated in its significance. In my opinion the only time research should make it to the undiscerning public is when a wealth of studies have been done independently, in agreement with one another.

[–] verdeviento@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would offer a different perspective, though it could be that I'm misreading your intention in the last sentence. Scientific findings should all be available to the public, which is the ultimate source of most research funding through taxation or through product pricing. Misunderstanding should be addressed through education, not restricting access to knowledge.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. Open access to the papers themselves is good. But they shouldn't be pushed into normal news feeds without more careful consideration.

[–] MrSpectroscopy@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Press releases will always overhype research to make it interesting to read. It is unfortunate those in the scientific community feel they need to do this. Many institutions pressure their researchers to submit these press releases so they can show off what they do to the public. As I type this, I realize how the institutions themselves feel they need these public summaries for their survival. Would taxpayers ever support research if they don't understand it??

Perhaps what is most needed is to drop the spin and hype while still informing the public about the scientific process and results!

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What would you consider as okay to mention as 'forever chemicals'?

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

None, it's a stupid term. Reminds me of sensationalist buzzwords they like to use on cable news and clickbait headlines.

[–] Francisco@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

You feel free to use expressions and terms as "rub me the wrong way", "buzzwords", and "clickbait". In those cases you are okay with the listener/reader interpreting the implicit meaning over their explicit wording. Why is "forever chemicals" different? Specially in an informal communication setting.

load more comments
view more: next ›