this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
830 points (97.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32106 readers
3587 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

hmm. tools are useful for what they are designed for. maybe design a bot to design bots.

[–] atlien51@lemm.ee -4 points 6 days ago
[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 244 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

how naive of him to think companies didn't already scrape his facial data from anywhere he might have had a picture 10 years ago

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 95 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. Last year some Harvard students put together a demo where they used Meta's smart glasses and commercial apps to scan people's faces, find their social media profiles, and summarize info about them, like where they live, work, their phone numbers, and names of their relatives in real time.

[–] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So basically Watch_Dogs profilers IRL

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 90 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Your "facial data" isn't private information. You give it away every time you go outside.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 47 points 1 week ago

every time you go outside.

You guys go outside? /j

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But your likeness does belong to you. Try making money off of an AI movie featuring Taylor Swift.

[–] booly@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't paparazzi make plenty of money off of selling unauthorized photos of celebrities? Celebrities can control some uses of their likeness, but not all of them.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

True, though for now paparazzi photos generally are “here’s the celebrity in real life doing [x]” whereas AI is “celebrity never did this thing and we applied their image / voice to it like they did.” Really difficult for celebs to shut down tabloid or fan ai-generated garbage, but I think the bigger issue for them right now is film or music studios just using their likeness to keep the profits churning

[–] 6nk06@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago

You're talking about the American concept of having no privacy in public. Not all countries are like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's already done, if you have any photographs of yourself on the internet. No need to fight that battle, accept and push forward.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I suppose I'll accept it and just start pushing forward with setting fires. 🔥

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (4 children)

And what if there's no photograph of myself online?

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did they not give Twitter their facial data when they uploaded their avatar?

[–] frog@feddit.uk 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They do, but even if they didn't AI companies are going take them anyway. Bots make up 50% of internet traffic. AI companies have ignored robot.txt entries. Anything publicly available, even if it's behind a password, is accessible since companies like Reddit sell that information.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bots make up 50% of internet traffic.

I've read a study that claimed ads were 50% of traffic by data volume.

Is anyone actually still using the internet, or is it all ad networks sending crap to bots?

[–] frog@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is my source : Forbes.

The source of the article is Imperva 2024 Bad Bot Report, but I cannot download the report. I do not know how they measured traffic. In this age of social media, I am going to guess it is by data volume and site visits.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even its hidden behind a password?

[–] frog@feddit.uk 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Like private subreddits or private messages.

[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ah when stuff is behind a password but not encrypted and still on their servers. Yes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Reddit is about to make that somewhat more "public", I heard they are changing the pm and DMs to a chat system

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 32 points 1 week ago

ITT: People expecting the most basic of logic from a blue checkmark's brain.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's cleverly addressing a valid point. If your face is visible on the internet it can be used in an ai database without your consent. That's just where we're at.

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago

yeah fair enough but every use of the studio Ghibli image generator is one too many

[–] VagueAnodyneComments@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the cool thing about consent is that you're allowed to attack everyone who pretends it isn't real with any amount of force

[–] stebo02@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

i mean, I would allow you, but the law doesn't unfortunately

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›