this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
64 points (95.7% liked)

Seattle

1551 readers
10 users here now

A community for news and discussion of Seattle, Washington and the surrounding area

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 35 points 11 months ago

Form a fucking union, fuck.

[–] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

I feel like if you have to call attendance to make sure they're present, because you can't tell by their job performance, maybe you don't need them in the office?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 23 points 11 months ago (1 children)

”Jassy added it wasn’t right for some employees to be in the office three days a week while others refuse to do so.”

Because this is a punishment, and more importantly, a vital means of maintaining control. So everyone needs to suffer equally, because we all know in the real world, and in business especially, fairness is the primary guiding philosophy.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 11 points 11 months ago

Right? This statement acknowledges that going into the office is undesirable.

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Give one person the whole team's badges. Take turns being the person who goes in with all the badges.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seattle resident here and ex-Amazon employee. Amazon has security staff (previously Securitas aka: Pinkertons) at all building badge entry points who specifically monitor for that kind of thing.

Also, it's hard for me to believe that Amazon was ever NOT monitoring, measuring and aggregating employee badge swipe data. That's far too useful a data point on individual employee behavior to leave it on the table. And there's zero obligation to either the public or Amazon's employees to disclose that they're doing it.

[–] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Also, it’s hard for me to believe that Amazon was ever NOT monitoring, measuring and aggregating employee badge swipe data.

Exactly. At the very least it's being logged, and has been since day one. A company as large as Amazon is going to have a full fledged reporting suite built into whatever solution they built around.

[–] Kylarean@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They’ve always logged. They just don’t have any type of reporting beyond “Yes, the badge was scanned on this day at this time”. And that isn’t even tied to any other system.

They run a report to create a spreadsheet that managers have to look over. Then they remove people from the spreadsheet who don’t have to come in. It goes back to, I assume, HR to handle after that.

A bunch of people are going in, scanning, riding the elevators up, screw around, ride the elevators down, badge out, and go home. That, so far, will keep them off the sheets.

[–] MelodiousFunk@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Given how oppressive the employee monitoring is on the blue collar side, I'm surprised they skimped on the white collar side.

[–] akakevbot@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Agreed, I can't imagine this is information they weren't logging, just that now they have a reason to regularly review it. The amount of data that is logged because it can is astounding.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Occupancy sensors are a thing unfortunately

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 months ago

You assume it's only the digital swipe they are monitoring and not the physical swipe. Also, I'm sure they have multiple offices.

I say, don't care about it. Collectively, don't go.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

I would have assumed they were already collecting this information.

Bonus - the funniest example of euphemistic corpspeak bullshit I’ve seen in a while:

“The information will help guide conversations as needed between employees and managers about coming into the office with their colleagues.”