Feeding kids = socialism = communism = bad devil stuff
-pretty much every MAGAT
this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
1220 points (99.7% liked)
Political Memes
8030 readers
3248 users here now
Welcome to politcal memes!
These are our rules:
Be civil
Jokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.
No misinformation
Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.
Posts should be memes
Random pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.
No bots, spam or self-promotion
Follow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.
No AI generated content.
Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Giving free stuff to the rich == good!
That's just good Jesus stuff.
This makes me think of a few years ago when a majority of french MPs voted against a subsidized 1€ meal for university students. And we're talking a full three-course meal. The savings in healthcare would have outweighed the cost by so much though…
Yet they will defend a clump of cells that mean nothing till the day they die.
Once they exit the womb, they are not pro life
They are not pro-anything, they are not even "pro-birth" as people often say because they don't allow for live saving procedures that could allow a mother to abort a non viable pregnancy and try again.
They are simply anti-abortion that's where their position starts and ends.
they are not even "pro-birth" as people often say because they don't allow for live saving procedures that could allow a mother to abort a non viable pregnancy and try again.
This is why I call them forced-birthers.
You're gonna have that kid if it kills you.
- republicans
Agree 100%
They don't give a duck about the fetus, they just want to tell women what to do with their bodies.
Schools have larger class sizes, a lack of supplies, they've integrated mentally challenged people into standard grades which distrupts the entire class. School lunches is only the tip of the problem.
That's a bit missing the point of why kids are going hungry at all in the first place.
I agree with this, but also the "muh tax dollars" talking point is full of flaws. We haven't even balanced the budget in almost thirty years. The government is debt spending. It's not even "your money" (whatever that would mean because greenbacks are literally state property printed by the state) because "your money" doesn't cover diddly squat.
They're printing fresh currency, and handing out bank transfers to the people at the top of the economy everyday because "your money" was handed out twice already.
Let the kids eat for free on the fucking government tab, just like you let Israel genocide for free on the government tab.
Not exactly.
The federal government has achieved fiscal balance (even surpluses) in just seven periods since 1776, bringing in enough revenue to cover all of its spending during 1817-21, 1823-36, 1852-57, 1867-73, 1880-93, 1920-30 and 1998-2001. We have also experienced six depressions. They began in 1819, 1837, 1857, 1873, 1893 and 1929.
I'm not calling for a balanced budget. I'm saying "muh tax dollars" is a shit argument.
No large economy has a balanced budget.
Except Germany for some years. Which led to us now having an infrastructure debt of 400 billion.