this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
795 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23401 readers
3484 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Senate hearing to review the FBI’s FY2026 budget request, Director Kash Patel was forced to admit that, despite the law requiring it, he had no such request ready to review.

This surprising development came during an awkward back-and-forth with Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), the ranking Democrat and Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, which oversees and approves budget requests.

Senator Murray reminded the FBI Director that the budget request was legally required “last week,” and after the director responded, she surprisedly added, “And your answer is you just understand you’re not going to follow the law?”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 26 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

This is what mediocrity looks like

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Mendacity.

He knew. He didn't care. He just put out his hand and dared the Senate not to give him a blank check.

And he's going to get that check, because Democrats more are terrified of looking obstructionist than of looking like they can govern.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

I'm going to upvote just from the great usage of the word Mendacity

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What does "legally required" here mean? I assume there's supposed to be a punishment?

[–] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I've not read the laws, nor am I a lawyer, but I suspect that the budget laws say something like "The [FBI] shall provide a budget by [date]", but there is no following section attaching a penalty as there are in criminal laws, so there is likely no recourse.

I imagine that this is the same as when you don't have that report ready for the big meeting, or skipped out early before your end-of-shift duties were done: a reprimand from your boss and potentially getting fired.... but his boss is, I think, Pam Bondi, the AG, in this case.

Theoretically Kash could be impeached or censured, as could Pam if she doesn't act. But we know how well that will go. Until then, his inaction is illegal, but unlike some of trumps actions, which can be stayed or reversed via court, I don't think you can stay inaction.

[–] JTskulk@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Maybe it means Kash isn't the FBI director since he didn't provide the budget. Whoever provides the budget first wins the title!

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago

He’s too busy running his clothing brand Based.

[–] Neuromorph@lemm.ee 11 points 15 hours ago

"I thought this was just a meet and greet"

[–] VampirePenguin@midwest.social 32 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Okay, so $0 for the FBI. Done!

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

That's what Trump wants. Take note of the military and ICE budgets, however..

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That’s what Trump wants.

It's win-win. Either Dems don't sign a blank check, and Trump uses this as an excuse to hand more power to the DHS. Or Dems do sign a blank check, and Trump uses it to fund an FBI dedicated to further dismantling the democratic state.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right now we are seeing a power struggle between at least two groups of plutocrats in the US.

The FBI is not on Trump's side. They're not exactly our friend, but their defunding would give more power to Trump

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

The FBI is not on Trump’s side.

The director of the FBI is absolutely on Trump's side. And anyone downstream of him who isn't is getting weeded out.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 4 points 17 hours ago

His name is Kash but he doesn't have any...

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Can't imagine how you'd expect an idiot like Kash Patel to do anything right at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 17 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I wonder if they’re advising agency heads to do this so they can fuck with the budget for their wealthy tax break bill?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 30 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No, I think he's that dumb. Look at the lies the Bush Jr. team came up with before the Iraq invasion. Those were great lies; handcrafted with Old World dedication and aged in oak barrels until they were perfect.

These clowns are just incompetent.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

People need to drop the "they're incompetent" shtick if they beat you every time. Because if you get beat by people you think are incompetent, what does that make you?

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

It implies nothing because it is not competence that is evaluated here.

Republicans beat Democrats because:

#1 A sizeable core of the American demographic cannot tell the difference between their elbow and a chair (too stupid) and are fearful of their own shadow

#2 The alternative, the Democrats, are almost as incompetent as the Republicans making the distinction moot.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 3 points 15 hours ago

The side that isn't willing to shoot up schools

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago

You can be great at one thing and an idiot at everything else.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In the photo, the fucker looks like a little kid who didn't do his homework and got caught in the lie.

Hardly the brightest and the best.

[–] FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like he always looks like that. He always looks like he's guilty and looking for an exit or coming up with the next lie. I can't imagine living like that

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

I'm going to guess drugs or alcohol.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago

My dog ate the budget!

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Reminds me of the Office: "I thought this was a meet and greet".

[–] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sfled@lemm.ee 1 points 14 hours ago

He's moving the FBI to Kash accounting.

load more comments
view more: next ›