this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
724 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1834 readers
339 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 124 points 2 days ago (15 children)

One of the mistakes they made with AI was introducing it before it was ready (I’m making a generous assumption by suggesting that “ready” is even possible). It will be extremely difficult for any AI product to shake the reputation that AI is half-baked and makes absurd, nonsensical mistakes.

This is a great example of capitalism working against itself. Investors want a return on their investment now, and advertisers/salespeople made unrealistic claims. AI simply isn’t ready for prime time. Now they’ll be fighting a bad reputation for years. Because of the situation tech companies created for themselves, getting users to trust AI will be an uphill battle.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 66 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Apple Intelligence and the first versions of Gemini are the perfect examples of this.

iOS still doesn’t do what was sold in the ads, almost a full year later.

Edit: also things like email summary don’t work, the email categories are awful, notification summaries are straight up unhinged, and I don’t think anyone asked for image playground.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 50 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Insert 'Full Self Driving' Here.

Also, outlook's auto alt text function told me that a conveyor belt was a picture of someone's screen today.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 48 points 2 days ago

capitalism working against itself

More like: capitalism reaching its own logical conclusion

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Kewlio251@midwest.social 35 points 1 day ago (3 children)

My problem is that it's not that fucking useful. I got the Pixel 9 specifically because of its advertised AI chip for the assistant and I swear it's just gotten worse since the Pixel 7. I used to be able to ask Google anything through the assistant, and now 90% of my questions are answered with "can't find the information."

They also advertised (or at least heavily alluded to) the use of the AI chip when you are in low network areas but it works just as good outside of 4g+ coverage as it ever did without the stupid chip.

Whats the point of adding AI branded nonsense if there's no practical use for it. And that doesn't even start to cover the issues with AI's reliability as a source of information. Garbage in = garbage out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 15 hours ago (11 children)

The thing LLMs can effectively replace is Google search (and other search engines). Microsoft is shoving copilot down your throat because shoving Bing up your ass was harder when it was already full of other shit.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Draegur@lemm.ee 62 points 1 day ago

Oh we care alright. We care about keeping it OUT of our FUCKING LIVES.

[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (5 children)

WTF is an AI computer? Is that some marketing bullshit?

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago

"Y2k ready" vibes.

[–] dreugeworst@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

afaict they're computers with a GPU that has some hardware dedicated to the kind of matrix multiplication common in inference in current neural networks. pure marketing BS because most GPUs come with that these days, and some will still not he powerful enough to be useful

[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 22 hours ago

This comment is the most importantly one in this thread. Laptops already had GPUs. Does the copilot button actually result in you conversing with an LLM locally or is inference done in the cloud? If the latter, it’s even more useless.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkstar@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 day ago
[–] TheThrillOfTime@lemmy.ml 62 points 2 days ago (12 children)

AI is going to be this eras Betamax, HD-Dvd, or 3d TV glasses. It doesn't do what was promised and nobody gives a shit.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Betamax had better image and sound, but was limited by running time and then VHS doubled down with even lower quality to increase how many hours would fit on a tape. VHS was simply more convenient without being that much lower quality for normal tape length.

HD-DVD was comparable to BluRay and just happened to lose out because the industry won't allow two similar technologies to exist at the same time.

Neither failed to do what they promised. They were both perfectly fine technologies that lost in a competition that only allows a single winner.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Don’t care AND are not stupid.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The average technical person realises ai is shit.
The average non-technical person doesn't need an ai computer, because chatgpt is free.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

I care. I care enough to crater copilot.

[–] detun3d@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Gen AI should be private, secure, local and easier to train by it's users to fit their own needs. Closest thing to this at the moment seems to be Kobold.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago

Google, Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia and everyone else is hyping up AI. Consumers are not really seeing much benefit by making everything AI-ified. Executives are raving over it but maybe aren't realize that people outside of the C-suite aren't that excited? Having it shoved in our faces constantly, or crammed in places companies hope they can save money is not helping either.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The only real purpose of AI is to get sweet VC money. Beyond that...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›