this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
627 points (97.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

11547 readers
674 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35 I hate i 35

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But hear me out, what if the train was powered by coal and suffering?

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I'm here trying to figure out if you mean that the train is powered by suffering and coal, or if you mean the train is suffering, and it is powered by coal.

I'm probably focusing on the wrong thing, but it feels important.

[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

Racism mostly...

[–] array@lemm.ee 4 points 20 hours ago

Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeepublicans

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago
[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

So hopefully they improve the transit situation in the cities & surrounding areas as well.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago

The main problem with the train would be that once you get to those cities, they are massive, sprawling, and lack good public transit.

We can't build mass transit because then we might need to build more mass transit.

Also, it would be entirely impossible to expand local mass transit after the intrastate rail broke ground but before it was finished. Couldn't be done. But we somehow can completely rewire I-45 to facilitate more interstate trucking.

[–] Treetrimmer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 20 hours ago

Just nuke Texas off the face of the earth

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 69 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The Train got cancelled the other week by Texas govt.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh, I knew the feds had cancelled grant money to it, I didn't know the state killed it. I know they're all in the pocket of big oil, but it's just wild to me how trains are apparently woke.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are woke because they have potential to improve lives regardless of class, race, or gender. Obviously they should have to "earn" those improvements by buying a car instead.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Quite literally this is why a lot of public transit got cancelled and destroyed - it made it easier for "those people" to come to the wealthier white parts of the city. In my city they literally built an interstate straight through downtown to make it harder for the large black population here to get out of the traditionally-black parts of the city.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 20 hours ago

I keep recommending The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America by Richard Rothstein. In the book, he documents how the modern suburb was created through zoning in order to keep Black people out by making living there too expensive, both through the land cost and the car needed to navigate it. It's really crazy just how open and deliberate it was!

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 day ago

Well that sucks

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

both dallas and houston have somewhat okay rail networks though

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think you Death Noted them, because HB 3187 made it through the House Transportation Committee an hour or two after you posted this comment. It would effectively kill DART (a ~30% service reduction).

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 11 hours ago

well at least my distain for america is validated i guess

At least in Houston, the transit isn't horrible if you stay in the inner loop. They gave a few rail lines and the buses run frequently there, so it's probably fine in theory. But if you have to leave the inner core...

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Well, you've got to start somewhere. CAHSR has been the impetus for a lot of sprawled out central valley cities to get their shit together. Fresno is probably the prime example of this. We're trying to drag Merced into getting its shit together, though kicking and screaming it may be.

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

(Seriously tho those wide urban highways split up a city as much as a river does. It looks like the Hudson in NYC with those massive bridges).

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I'm too lazy to do that, but maps of Texan cities where their highways were edited to water bodies would really prove this point.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Displacing minorities is a feature. Otherwise Those People might build up generational wealth, and eventually start considering themselves white people’s equals. POSIWID.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 1 points 19 hours ago

TIL a new acronym, but one doesn't need to infer the purpose of the system from what it does. The designers of the system said out loud that segregation was a feature. They gave speeches and wrote memos about it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Land is more important than people. That’s why Wyoming gets the same number of senators as California.

[–] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Steal stolen land, you mean.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Steal land. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. Steal it again. Sell it. Let the locals improve it. If anyone complains, tell them that you shouldn't care about the latest set of owners because they bought it off you when you stole it from the last set of owners.

Don't ask who profits. It's definitely not six families who showed up wealthy and have only ever been getting richer for the last century.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

See, what happened is Texas heard something about bullets and got a bit ahead of itself.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If it was a new interstate or an extra lane on the Katy freeway, nobody would be saying shit. My favorite example is how there's in interstate project in the northeast that's pretty much as overbudget as CAHSR and basically nobody is talking shit about it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

what, railway? no no, this is a superhighway for coupled-car vehicles!

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don’t know that that’s an “average Texan,” I think that’s more “average massively wealthy landholding Texan.”

[–] FundMECFS@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 day ago

Certainly is average Texan voter. They vote for this.

(Although they’ve mostly been indoctrinated from a young age so the blame is more on the corpocratic state elite than the population).