this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
912 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23422 readers
2378 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Doesn't even know the presidential oath he pledged.

You proud now MAGAts? Does this make you proud?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 58 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED! THIS MAN SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY RESPONSIBLE POSITION! HE SHOULDN'T BE IN CHARGE OF A LEMONADE STAND MUCH LESS A COUNTRY! WHY DID AMERICA ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN! THE MAN DOESN'T WANT TO DO HIS JOB OF UPHOLDING THE CONSITUTION! THAT'S LIKE A DOCTOR SAYING THEY DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE TO ABIDE BY THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH! TRUMP AND ALL OF THE REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS NEED TO BE TRIED FOR TREASON! WHY HAS THIS MADNESS GONE ON SO LONG!

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 11 points 6 days ago (4 children)

THERE IS NO ADULT WAITING IN THE WINGS TO SWOOP IN AND SAVE YOUR NATION! BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE! THE REASON NO ONE IS STOPPING THIS IS EVERYONE IS BUSY ASKING "WHY IS THIS SHIT ALLOWED!"!

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 56 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.

-President Trump, just this year.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"to the best of my abilities" is the loophole here

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 11 points 6 days ago

He treats it will all the seriousness that he treats his wedding vows.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Oh he literally forgot the oath of the presidency? Sounds like a good reason to invoke the 25th amendment.

[–] SereneSadie@lemmy.myserv.one 47 points 6 days ago (14 children)

This what you get, no-vote cowards.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 40 points 6 days ago (4 children)

All I can do is laugh at this point. This regime is so buffoonish and so open with their intentions that I genuinely wonder how people fell for this shit and continue to believe it. Are we really this fucking dumb ?

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, we sit around and laugh about how stupid he is while he ignores the law and constitution to the detriment of the freedom of citizens and immigrants alike.

We are literally that stupid.

[–] carrion0409@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (6 children)

I want an extensive study done on the brains of maga supporters when this is over. I need to know what is going on up there that makes them act the way they do.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

More research is always good, as it can deepen our understanding, but the basic outline of what's going on is already known. A lot of people just don't want to believe it, because we're all stuck on the metaphor that we're all captains of the ship inside our own heads. You see it in this thread; people want to blame non-voters, as if millions of people all had perfect information and all made decisions based upon it through conscious reasoning. Because they're just—I dunno—bad people? (Which is a completely bonkers belief when you start to dig into it.)

Actually, neuroscience tells us that consciousness doesn't really exist, except as an emergent phenomenon of sensory experience. Brain scans show that thoughts, feelings, and decisions occur before we're consciously aware of them; the conscious mind is basically a rationalization machine, inventing narratives about why we did a thing or felt a certain way, only after the fact. And, it's notoriously bad at it. (The Misattribution of Arousal is one of the classic examples.) So, if you can affect the way that somebody's brain works, you can in many ways control what the they think and feel.

And that's exactly what authoritarian demagogues do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 9 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I've been thinking that for nearly ten years now.

load more comments (3 replies)

Yes, very fearful too, but worse even: selfish, hateful and evil.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

To be fair, I don't know either. I mean he's supposed to, and he swore an oath to, but if nobody is going to enforce that then must he really? What happens if/when he doesn't?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_baby_duck@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I always go back to that early coronavirus briefing where a reporter questioned his authority to dictate state government lockdown policies and he just sat there stunned, repeating "when you're the president your authority is total because you have total authority, it's total..." It's been clear for years that this fucking guy never understood the job description, and rather than learning anything from experience, he's having it rewritten. The constitution isn't going to save us from that.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

He has no idea what he is doing. Never has.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Turns out as long as they have ( R ) next to their name, the president can operate with all the integrity of a five year old trying to get out of cleaning their room

[–] Floon@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

The oath of office has one stipulation. Just one.

He's taken it twice. He's such an evil man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Trump probably had his fingers crossed while he took the oath.

[–] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

He didn't bother putting his hand on the Bible. Not that I care, but you'd think his "omg christian patriot doggy mommy" followers would say something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

At this point I’m just curious how long this will go on. What would have to tilt for a group of politicians to overhaul his ass and the r’s supporting him?

[–] ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I believe it will continue until the politicians are scared of an angry mob kicking in their door.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Food shortages will do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] drsilverworm@midwest.social 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of Trumpers here decorate their cars with "We the people..." in Constitution-style script. I wonder how much of it he needs to violate for them to see the disconnect.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lexam@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"I don't know" the defense of criminals and toddlers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 19 points 6 days ago (5 children)

What does it take to get this guy out of office? Genuine question. We impeached this guy like twice but it didn't go through

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago

A coffin is the only way. It’ll probably be easier to secede.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago

"I don't think so" is what he meant

[–] SuperCub@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

There's only one correct answer and that's not it...

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 11 points 6 days ago

Get. Him Out!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

he means he doesn't know the definition of constitution

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You just gotta love it that this shit stain is supported by constitution lovers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

That's because he can't spell it without looking at his phone

load more comments
view more: next ›