this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1424 points (98.4% liked)

Facepalm

3149 readers
17 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA threads post saying "There has never been another nation ever that has existed much beyond 250 years. Not a single one. America's 250th year is 2025. The next 4 years are gonna be pretty interesting considering everything that's already been said." It has a reply saying "My local pub is older than your country".

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Rome lasted for 2,000 years because I consider the Byzantines as true Romans.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I dunno, I'm pretty sure Japan is older.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Depends what you define as nation. Modern day Japan is only 157 years old since the Meiji Restoration started in 1868.

Like the US will still exist after the American empire collapses but sure as hell not in it’s current form.

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Then the US can only count since the civil war 🤷‍♂️ Or maybe since Hawaii's invasion (1959).

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 10 points 1 week ago

I don't consider different eras as different nations though. I think that's splitting too many hairs. I see a nation as a country that is generally united and governed by a leading entity.

Going back to the Japan example, I would consider them a nation when all the clans were united under one rule. Same with UK, India, Thailand etc.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] PapstJL4U@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because the concept of a nation state is not much older, no? American Independence and French Revolution were among the first movements.

Isn't it kinda interesting, that the first nation is still a thing? France is in it's 5th iteration.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Matombo@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

i think the first poster misunderstood a quote and I can't reproduce it anymore either. it was something about no empire lasted more then 250 years? or no government form or something among these lines? it was not about the country disapearing in name or anything, but that it damatically changes in one way or another like completly changing the form of government

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

Even if this were true, this would be anthropic reasoning, which is always suspect. The belief that the present, the here and now, cannot be exceptional will always overlook examples where it is exceptional.

We live in interesting times.

[–] qyron@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My country is 900 years old and my people has inhabited these lands before the romans ever dreamed of set foot here.

That is plain ignorance.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yarr@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

This isn't a facepalm. As any red-blooded American knows, the only country worth mentioning is America. Since all countries of note were founded after America, this OP is correct.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

I believe the ottoman empire (1299–1922) would like a word.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

It probably has a more stable foundation too!

How many different countries has your pub survived?

[–] ndupont@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Remember the time we stumbled on an old local church with an American coworker. Yes dude, that thing was over 500 years old when Columbus discovered your continent, allegedly.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›