this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
1424 points (98.4% liked)

Facepalm

3149 readers
101 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA threads post saying "There has never been another nation ever that has existed much beyond 250 years. Not a single one. America's 250th year is 2025. The next 4 years are gonna be pretty interesting considering everything that's already been said." It has a reply saying "My local pub is older than your country".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 216 points 1 week ago (4 children)

the u.s. is 'young', relative to the world stage, this is true; but its constitution is among the oldest in the world.. and it is starting to show its age.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 183 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah, this is a misunderstanding among conservatives. Our legal system and government structure is woefully outdated, but our country is really young.

It's like a teen athlete being really proud that he has the oldest sneakers of all the competitors.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cabbage@piefed.social 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Constitutionalism is a new idea. Pioneered by America. Of course America will have the oldest until it collapses.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

It was "showing its age" a not long after it was made. Two years later the French based their first written constution on the US one. Then other nations followed suit over the years and wanted their own, and they already thought the French one was the better option as a starting point.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 109 points 1 week ago (2 children)

'In the UK, 100 kilometers is a long way. In the USA, 100 years is a long time.'

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 85 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, yeah, that first person is a dumb-ass, but that second comment doesn't really prove anything. I live in a 400 year-old town in this 250 year-old country,

[–] Tikiporch@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, we have bars in the USA that predate the founding of the country as well. White Horse Tavern in Newport, Rhode Island had been operating since 1673.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, I'm in Massachusetts, and you can drive to any town on the North Shore and find houses with plaques dating them to the late-sixteen or early-seventeen hundreds. They're not even landmarks, they're just someone's house.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 21 points 1 week ago

The first statement is just so stupid, the second is just a dunk because it didn't need to be rebutted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 80 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even ignoring how obviously wrong this is about how old other countries are, America turns 250 in 2026 not 2025 lol

[–] potoo22@programming.dev 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know this not because I paid attention in history class, but because I played Fallout 76 where the vault dwellers celebrate America's Tricentennial before leaving the vault and find it a wasteland.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

They're not being precise with their language, but their point is largely true. What they really mean is that the US has the oldest still active Constitution in the world. The UK has existed in a continuous government for far longer, but they don't have a written Constitution like the US does.

Yeah, it's easy to shit on Americans about being ignorant of history. But this person's point is largely true. The US has had the same constitution in effect for nearly 250 years. It is the oldest written constitution on Earth still in effect. Most nations have revolutions or complete rewrites of their foundational legal documents long before they reach this point.

And this is also why the US has such political instability right now. We have a Constitution that was written for the needs of 250 years ago. It was formed from a series of compromises that made sense in the politics of 250 years ago. At this point, we really should scrap it entirely and start from scratch. Having the world's oldest Constitution really isn't something worth bragging over; it just means you're running obsolete software.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (7 children)

What they really mean is that the US has the oldest still active Constitution in the world. The UK has existed in a continuous government for far longer, but they don’t have a written Constitution like the US does.

Even if that is what they meant, and even if the UK doesn't count for whatever reason, this would still be incorrect. The constitution of San Marino dates from 1600.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm all for giving people the benefit of doubt, but no. They don't "really mean" that, otherwise they would have written "constitution" somewhere, and not wrote "has had" when they mean "currently active".

It's possible they misremembered someone who had a point, true, but they do not.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

There's a restaurant near me that's been in business since 1472.
They went bankrupt in 2023. Weird kind of feel.

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Man, the final owner of the business must have some interesting feelings being the one that drove it into the ground after 550 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 46 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bro he could've done a single online search and disproved himself in literal seconds.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Freedom of expression has morphed into freedom of stupidity.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KurtVonnegut@mander.xyz 39 points 1 week ago (14 children)

It is wild to me how Americans forget that they built their "nation" upon the genocide of earlier (first) nations, which were there for thousands of years.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Not really. The logic is attempting to draw a distinction between nations, kingdoms, and tribes, among other things, with emphasis on continuity in governance. So France isn't the same nation between the Revolution and the Napoleonic Empire, or after a dynasty change.

The interjection is pointless towards their argument because it doesn't understand the "logic" and is wrong in its own way.

His problem is that, as a truly stupid person, he isn't aware that the point he is trying to make is one reserved specifically for democracies, not nations, and is still wrong. The Roman Republic lasted for 482 years, just to start with the most famous "democratic" example, and Japan's government could be argued to have lasted 2,600 years depending on how much credit you want to give the mythological founding of their imperial family.

Further, the modern form of the United Kingdom government was founded in 1707. There have been changes, obviously, especially in the power balance between Lords and Commons, but the Acts of Union created what is indisputably a modern concept of nation and government.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 week ago (32 children)

France, Switzerland, england, bavaria, brandenburg, vatican, spain, netherlands, denmark, sweden, portugal

I could go on and on

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man, imagine being so fucking dense you literally ignore the nation that created yours, which is still around. Inglun? Wazzat?

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 28 points 1 week ago (15 children)

About 15 years ago, I got to go on a road trip across the states. 6 weeks, driving from east coast to west coast.

On more than one occasion, when we were inevitably asked where we were from and dutifully replied "England.", we were met with utterly blank stares.

"Uhhhhhhhh, Engerland?" "You mean New England? Never met anyone from there before..."

"No, England. Old England. The original England, capital city, London. That England."

"London? That's just north of here... I don't get it."

I swear, the sheer ignorance and lack of basic understanding of the geography of our world was fucking staggering in some places. Not always the armpit of nowhere "towns" either.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago (7 children)

China, also: your dynasty is closing in on 300 years, huh? Good luck!

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Who did the US get independence from, buddy?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've also heard the right say that America is the best and youngest country. Like they seriously think they are the most recent country to be formed.

They also think that America is #1 despite being the "youngest" makes them even extra good.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Americans don't have the mental capacity to look beyond their borders.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Wait till these people find out about Japan.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (22 children)

Dumb people hear something, misunderstand it, and repeat an incorrect version with authority and without any critical thinking. I'm sure this person heard that the US is the oldest existing democracy. The next oldest, depending on the criteria you use, is probably Switzerland at 175+ years. But does this person really think that the US has existed longer than, say, the ancient Egyptians, the Ottomans, the Byzantines, etc.?

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago

The 250 year thing is basically complete BS

[–] pcalau12i@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

While the US is pretty old as a state, most societies have a direct continuation from one state to the next. It's not like when France overthrew its monarchy they stopped being France or seeing themselves as French. So they may see their continuous history as much older than the current state, with the Kingdom of France going back to 987.

The US doesn't have a continuous history prior to 1776 because they mostly come from Britain but they denounce their British heritage and they settled in NA but also denounce the heritage of the local peoples there. So the average American sees their entire history as starting at 1776, maybe a little bit further back to include the initial colonies and that's about it.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] rockettaco37@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You guys think it's bad reading all this online?

Try living here...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThickQuiveringTip@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Holy fuck. I can't tell if they are a troll or not. Reading that is infuriatingly stupid. No wonder America is in the shemozzle it is now, this idiocy and lack of critical thinking is far too common over there!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 week ago

There's a certain irony that there are a couple of cases of "my local pub is older than your entire country" in the country in question. For example the White Horse Tavern in Newport, RI.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Does this person not understand how dates work?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›