this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
1248 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

6851 readers
1765 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 4 points 28 minutes ago

This wouldn't even cover the hospital bill for most people lol.

And since hospitals know moms will be getting an extra 5k they will just add that into the cost somehow. /s

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)
  • A: This is the 'bad' kind of incentive. My mom worked in a hospital where people on would come in pregnant, tons of neglected kids in tow, asking how much wellfare they could get for the next kid. Stuff like vouchers for school, care, healthcare and stuff doesn't incentive that.

  • B: It's hilariously inadequate and out-of-touch. $5K for childcare these days is a joke, even as a nice supplement.

...But that's the point. This is for show, like Trump's COVID checks with his signature on them. It's a brand to tell people "Hey! I'm Trump, and I'm helping you!" directly, not policy to enact change. It's also hilariously hypocritical, seeing how much 'blank check hand-outs' were criticized for decades.

[–] Elkot@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

It's free to give birth here

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

He should know that you can't buy that many diapers with $5k.

Unless he doesn't do his own diaper shopping I guess...

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 2 hours ago

With the tariffs that hardly helps.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

5000$ is a lot. In Germany you get only 250€

well, that'sper month until they're 27 (as long as they're still in school/university)
plus free healthcare for mother and child
plus free daycare (depending on the state)
plus free schools and universities
...

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 57 minutes ago (1 children)

We can all hope once the nazis leave, we too can be a civilized country.

[–] DrDeadCrash@programming.dev 1 points 16 minutes ago

I'm with you here, but we need to keep in mind that the nazis never "leave". We'll need to forever and continually keep these bastards from power.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

You forgot maternity leave, something the 'mricans don't know, either.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

To add on, seems like the 5k (USD) is a one-time lump sum. Your price quote from Germany is already 3k (EUR) after a year. It only every outscales the 5k.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 2 points 3 hours ago

See. Let's ping Trump and tell him about it.

Maybe he'll see the light

[–] whitewashersmud@lemmy.world -1 points 43 minutes ago

Thanks, feminism.

[–] imetators@lemm.ee 0 points 49 minutes ago (1 children)

Heard they planning to do same shit in Russia. Honestly, I don't think this will work in any country.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 11 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Daycare cost $2k a month

Is that for real? That's more than (many) private schools in Europe.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago

A 2 bedroom 1 bathroom house in Toronto costs more than a castle in france

[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Well to be fair, that's what it costs in many European countries, too.

That's why many women don't work. The cost is basically as high as a low paying or part time job.

That's why everyone needs free daycare. That will generate a higher GDP for everyone.

[–] whitewashersmud@lemmy.world -1 points 37 minutes ago (2 children)

That’s why many women don’t work. The cost is basically as high as a low paying or part time job.

Interesting point. We should re-normalize the idea of the stay-at-home mom.

Let's be real, the people who promoted women going to work were almost always willing to shame those who decided not to. Let's stop doing that.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 minutes ago

What in the tradwife?

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 24 minutes ago

Stay at home parents should get paid. If free daycare would cost the government $20 a day, offer stay at home parents $10 a day and you save money while allowing people to raise their kids instead of strangers.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (3 children)

https://www.daycarefee.com/countries/germany/

I don't have a full analysis, but at least this source points at 1500 to be the high end of the expensive cities in Germany, with public care as low as 100.

So is 2000 a "normal" value in many areas, or a high end of some?

I have the feeling this is inflated and we just accept.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 1 points 11 minutes ago

$3000 is average in the big cities for infant care in a daycare center, and it drops down to about $2000 for toddlers.

Some places have options for home-based care where a person can get licensed to take care of children in their own home, and the prices are generally about half of that of the center-based care.

One big issue is ratios. If the wage for a child care worker is $30/hour including the cost of paid vacation, health insurance, and you need coverage for 9 hours per day, 5 days a week, while needing to maintain one teacher for every 4 kids, that's $340/week or about $1450/month for labor alone, assuming no overtime and perfect staffing ratios. Throw in food, rent, utilities, insurance, other operational expenses, and it's pretty much impossible to provide care for less than $2000/month per child on the costs side.

[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Thanks for sharing.

I checked for Netherlands and it seems to be easily over 2k a month for fulltime care (172-240 hours).

The thing I wasn't aware of is the subsidies low income parents receive. Up to 96%. Seems to be a bit lower in practice, but still almost all is covered.

That doesn't account for high cost areas, and is dependent on income. But the conclusion seems to be that it's far cheaper than I mentioned for the end consumer.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 26 minutes ago (1 children)

So 2000 a month is greater than the max of the range in the most expensive states.

All values are crazy, don't get me wrong. But less crazy than originally stated.

[–] exasperation@lemm.ee 1 points 10 minutes ago

Even the most expensive states are averaged out between cheap suburban and rural areas and the actual expensive cities where the jobs are. $2000/month would be an unbelievable bargain in cities like San Francisco or New York.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 hours ago

https://blog.dol.gov/2024/09/30/we-analyzed-5-years-worth-of-childcare-prices-heres-what-we-found#%3A%7E%3Atext=Monthly+childcare+prices+in+2018%2Cof+a+family%27s+median+income).

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2024/05/15/business/child-care-cost-average-annual

It can depend of state to state too. In Oklahoma, our cost of living is considered low but we have a high poverty rate. Our median income per household is 67k, and single income is 35k. Childcare for infants averages around $800 a month

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 22 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Wages have not kept up with productivity and GDP increases since the 1970s.

How about making single income middle class families possible again, so you can have one stay at home parent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Doctor_Satan@lemm.ee 50 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It won't even cover the cost of giving birth. This is some real "how much could a banana cost" energy.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the cost of giving birth will magically jump up by $5,000 as soon as this passes. It was never a function of how much it cost to actually provide that service.

[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

$8000 if the mother wants to hold her baby after birth

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

And you wanna take that baby home? Well there's a few for that.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They'll need a population boost after Trump deny's immigrants entrance into America.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] qbus@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

$5k in a Roth IRA in the sp500 at birth is the only way that it is worth anything.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 hours ago

Haha, what's $4k in the sp500 gonna do? I guess having $3k in the sp500 is better than nothing...

[–] based_raven@lemm.ee -2 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

You can't clothe a baby for a year with $5k? We did it for basically fuck all. Had a load of stuff handed on from other parents, got some stuff from ebay and in sales. The fuck are you dressing the kid in, solid gold? Also how much is this person spending on diapers? There is no way you're spending $5k on nappies and clothes for a baby in one year, utter lunacy. Not that I agree with anything that Trump does, but this seems like a huge overreaction. I'm not from the US so I don't know how expensive this stuff is over there, but if it really costs this much to clothe one baby for a year then fuck me and I'm shocked.

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 1 points 22 minutes ago

I'm not from the US so I don't know how expensive this stuff is over there, but if it really costs this much to clothe one baby for a year then fuck me and I'm shocked.

Be prepared to be shocked.

[–] whitewashersmud@lemmy.world -3 points 40 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

A lot of these people have been conditioned to spend their money like idiots while complaining they don't have enough.

These are the kinds of people who are "too good" to shop at Walmart and subscribe to things they can be getting for free.

load more comments
view more: next ›