this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
14 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3999 readers
15 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archived (Wayback Machine)

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In the new study, the vast majority of the microplastics were concentrated on the root caps of the plants, a protective structure on the tip of the plant’s roots. A smaller amount was observed in the roots themselves, and even less was found in the stem. No plastic was detected in the leaves.

Notably, removal by binding them, not dissolving them.

I don't get why you would then suggest farming the leaves only. The microplastics are still in the environment then.

Especially the burning example, wouldn't collecting the whole plant and burning the roots too remove the microplastics from the environment instead of only binding them?

[–] Vodulas@beehaw.org 3 points 6 days ago

I don’t get why you would then suggest farming the leaves only.

They were suggesting using the leaves as food for livestock, so you would not want the plastics in it. This is a guess, but I think they were just trying to say it could be a dual purpose "crop" since the leaves don't contain any microplastics