this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2025
847 points (99.2% liked)

World News

45651 readers
2401 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 16 points 2 days ago

FUCK 47, HE BELONGS AT THOSE TRIALS TOO, IN SHACKLES, AND WITH A GUY WITH A NOOSE MEAN MUGGING HIM

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Who gives a shit if Trump is in opposition when they (we, I’m American) are purposely fucking up global trade?

[–] Alien@feddit.nl -5 points 1 day ago

Britain is a fucking joke.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

Two countries didn't sign that agreement. Who cares what the US and israel think about it. However just like a low functioning sovereign citizen I hope both current leaders are subject to that court despite their disbelief in it validity.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

"Despite?" Should be "in light of"

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This is just propaganda - how objective will this tribunal be when you know what kind of "wars of aggression" the UK, Israel or the US have done and are still doing?

And no this is not whataboutism - it's about truthfulness and moral standing. Invasion if Iraq and Afghanistan, decades of foreign policies, occupation and oppression of Palestinians, meddling and regime change of countries. If it's only a crime of aggression if the other side does it, then it's simply a farce or a show trial that will not prevent future crimes of aggression.

You are first and foremost responsible for your own actions. And only then responsible for holding others responsible.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure what your point is frankly.

You are first and foremost responsible for your own actions.

So you think countries should recognize and punish themselves for "being the bad guys"?

Do you see any country as having the "required moral standing" to judge others?

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

So you think countries should recognize and punish themselves for “being the bad guys”?

I think people and journalists should be educated and informed so they can see it for the theater it is. If the people of a democracy can't see the evil their own countries have been doing or do not have the means to change anything, then those leaders pointing the fingers at others for the same shit becomes nothing but a distraction.

[–] honeynut@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (5 children)

What a hexbear style of argumentation. Nice alt LOL. You're telling me Russia and China should be allowed to prosecute anyone?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 day ago

Perhaps Britain should look in the mirror.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›