this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
225 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37717 readers
409 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was happily using this for a year or so now. Feels fairer than using an ad blocker. But now they apparently want more money out of people. Feels like some sort of internet video apocalypse is happening, where the services become extremely fragmented and expensive, like YouTube, netflix, hbo, Hulu, Disney+ and whatnot. Each wants some 10-20€ out of your pocket.

I guess that means back to ad blockers and piracy...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Thalestr@beehaw.org 93 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think we're starting to see the beginning of YouTube's end. The algorithm is actively choking the life out of the platform, they're forcing viewers to pay fees that seem to keep getting bigger and bigger, and they're making life miserable for creators while also paying them less and less.

Once another platform comes along that ticks enough boxes to satisfy people then YouTube will be absolutely screwed. The only reason we all use that wretched site is because there is no viable alternative. More and more creators are moving to premium platforms like Nebula that offer better deals for viewers and creators alike. I'm likely to jump ship myself once more people I watch also join up.

[–] lemillionsocks@beehaw.org 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Youtube is still the biggest video website on the world and there just isnt a viable competitor to it and nor is there financial incentive for anyone to jump into something like it given the overhead and cost. Hell even early on when youtube was lower resolution and ran worse on hardware it still beat out competitors like vimeo, dailymotion, and the various early internet content creator sites that spun off of youtubes early copyright purge.

At the end of the day they serve a tiny amount of ads which honestly is more of a minor inconvenience(especially when you remember what TV was like) and the algorithm is pretty hit and miss(personally on my feed it's not bad). Even worst case scenario if the adblockers stop working youtube will probably still not die.

It would take an antitrust hearing or something to really push youtube off of it's top spot and it would be interesting to see what that would look like for the site(though I suspect a google dismembering would leave youtube intact and just remove it form other alphabet brands which wouldnt entirely fix the issue).

Hell look at what happened on reddit. That was a very visible very big protest and there was a huge amount of outrage and reddit skews nerdy enough that the userbase actually pays attention and cares about whats going on. Weeks later and not a lot has changed. Lemmy and some other alternatives became viable but even then it And thats essentially just a big message board which links to content on other sites, in terms of design it should be easier to replicate compared to an open video site that anyone can upload to.

[–] theangriestbird@beehaw.org 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wouldn't say that nothing has changed. Maybe you have to be a former daily user to notice, but most of the subs have gone downhill. Quality of posts is at a 10-year low, likely due to the mass exodus of power users and mods. I'm not saying that every valuable user has left, and I'm not saying that reddit is dead. But the quality-to-shit ratio went from 60/40 to 40/60, and it is noticeable.

[–] jsdz@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah I've been back there a few times to check, and the reddit I knew is most certainly dead. Its corpse will stumble around for a while animated by venture capital necromancy, but it's not really a threat any more and will stop moving soon enough. Youtube still has much enshittification to go before it gets to that point.

[–] sphere_au@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I think what's likely to happen isn't that we'll see one replacement for YouTube, but a large number of niche and possibly subscription based or peer to peer sites that collectively end up offering everything of value that YouTube does/used to.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Haven't they said the same thing about the last 10 adocalypses

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, but we keep hoping something better will show up, it's just taking way too long.

I think something like Reddit/Lemmy needs to happen to YouTube, the content creators are just not at that point yet.

[–] Dee_Imaginarium@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is a fediverse version of YouTube already called PeerTube. But people are finding it's incredibly expensive to host video streaming servers and is a large part why it hasn't really taken off.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Well, that and a host of other problems with its interface. Nobody's very interconnected, so it's hard to find videos.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Not to mention you're paying for it, where the goal for making videos to to get paid lol. Peertube has no ability to monetize, so even if the hosting was somehow solved, the monetization would prevent it from taking off.

[–] mrmacduggan@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Less-corporate, creator-owned networks like Nebula and Dropout might be a potential route to a more sustainable and less centralized online video ecosystem.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 18 points 1 year ago

What requires YouTube's end is a competitor, and there is no competition. People might complain about YouTube, but it still remains the free video streaming platform. Everything else is paid, including small streamers like Nebula. You also have small content creators relying on YouTube to advertise and draw traffic.

You might jump ship, but the market doesn't seem to be doing so. If anything, people are reevaluating their paid streaming services to go less instead of more. People will complain about YouTube, but it is still the cheapest option.

[–] Sina@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago

Once another platform comes along that ticks enough boxes to satisfy people then YouTube will be absolutely screwed.

This is 100% true, the issue is it's very unlikely for that happen out of nowhere. Youtube is a service that needs a lot of work & $ to compete with & they have all the content creators locked in as well. Personally I would love to be on a video platform where people just want to spread information for fun & to educate people, how youtube used to be, instead of everyone monetizing everything with clickbait video covers, titles, while making arbitrarily long videos to satisfy some Youtube ad criteria.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

User content deliver platform is a really bad business model cause:

  • there is always that free option, pirate, rip record and the share, or simply patreon that skips the platform's fee taking once you are big enough.
  • if you try to charge for ad, then you need enough conversion rate(views->click through, views->query or views->sales), there is really not much options to do this, if you make another youtube clone, you pretty much can't pay for the infrastructure nor bandwidth.
  • you still have to deal with all the other stuff, DMCA, content moderation, age restriction, reports, etc.(these are cost sink that does not generate revenue at all.)

I don't know how Nebula do the revenue split, can a user even specify like I want to support this creator only? cause from what I see only 50% revenue is distributed, that means the bigger channel you are traffic wise, the more you get from sign ups. so smaller creators might not have a good time there compare to the patreon model.(where user pay directly to them and the end user just watch youtube or from other source direct stream/download).

[–] ConsciousCode@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Nebula is so cheap I have a subscription even though I almost never use it. I would use it more if they had a better recommendation system, as it is now you almost have to search for a specific video you want or dig through piles of random videos you don't care about.

[–] SeriousBug@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I mostly open Nebula when I'm watching a video, and the creator says "I had to censor this on YouTube, you can get the full version on Nebula"

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 year ago

Nebula seems geared as a curated collection of small content makers that make more money per watch of Nebula content than YouTube. You also have some content creators who get additional funds to do larger productions on Nebula that are either Nebula exclusive or Nebula first.

I would probably see it as a middle ground between YouTube and a Patreon gift.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I really hope there is something like a flare system. You pay a fixed price every month, and that money gets distributed by watchtime or likes or so between creators. Including higher budget creations such as series and movies. Maybe depending on production budget, they can get a multiplier. Since a movie minute is usually a lot more expensive than a random guy talking into a microphone.

[–] mooseknee@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Nebula does this. I really like the platform except there aren't comments. Sometimes I like reading the comments on a video

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 year ago

The CEO is never going to add comments.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So does it have access to all the content from YouTube, netflix, hbo, Disney+ etc?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] relic_@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

YouTube already does that, though? In fact your premium sub helps creators much more than a non-premium viewer does. Of course the multiplier proposition would be new/different.

Not trying to shill for YouTube but that's one of the main reasons I have a subscription is to support creators I like.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Premium sub probably does but not guaranteed. Iirc, premium subs offer creators $ from google via time watched, vs free users ad impressions.

Its part of the reason why some youtube channels have scheduled Livestreams, as Livestreams make a lot of money off premium subscribers watching.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well true, but YouTube does not have all the content of the other streaming platforms, and also wants you to pay extra for e.g. movies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] airportline@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So they're actively working to block ad blockers, showing more ads, and bundling the ad free version with a worse version of Spotify—a no-win scenario.

The Google's breakup can't happen fast enough.

[–] FFF982@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But soon, existing Premium Lite subscribers will be left with two options: go back to watching YouTube with ads or subscribe to the pricier YouTube Premium that also includes YouTube Music.

There is a third option.

[–] geophysicist@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 year ago

With a bottle of rum

[–] Piers@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

YouTube music pays artists slightly less badly than most services fwiw.

[–] upstream@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Still not a reason to give Google more power.

[–] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One word: reVanced

More words: No need to thank me. Thank the developers instead.

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Here's the official link cause some of the top search results are scams:

https://revanced.app

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 2 points 1 year ago

I've still got Revanced installed on my phone, but I've gone a step further and setup my own Piped instance, for added privacy. Only downside is there's no Piped client for Chromecast (yet).

[–] bownage@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was happily using Lite as well and them just announcing it's discontinuing in a month feels really unfair. I don't want the added functionality of youtube premium. I don't want to pay €15 a month for the same thing I had before for half the money. Now I have to find an alternative, and I think for me it will also be ad blockers and piracy. I'll miss casting youtube to my TV ad free though...

[–] ChanchoManco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can totally cast from revanced on your phone to smart tube on your tv. It's not as seamless because you have to set it up once and need to open smart tube open manually beforehand but it's easy enough.

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The fire fox focus IOS browser blocks all ads on YouTube in my experience.

[–] BigVault@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've posted it repeatedly but I'd like to add the (paid extension) Vinegar extension as a recommendation for iOS Safari.
Enable extension, add YT to home screen and stop seeing ads.
Combined with Banish for Safari - stopping the "open in app" popups on websites, my online experience is golden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I've never, ever, had any ad run with plain old firefox and ublock.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Bandicoot_Academic@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just gonna leave these completly unrelated links here:

uBlock Origin (Web):

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublock-origin/

Revanced (Android):

https://github.com/revanced

https://revanced.app

Newpipe (Android):

https://newpipe.net/

SmartTube Next (Android Based Smart TVs):

https://github.com/yuliskov/SmartTubeNext

uYou+ (iOS):

https://github.com/qnblackcat/uYouPlus

[–] Tosti@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Purged by creator

[–] escape@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Oh damn it. Never knew this existed in my country. I have hade the full premium the entire time, and I only have it so I can't get rid of the ads...

[–] drew_belloc@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

The only thing keeping me on youtube is the fact that i still can have a rss feed (since the app wasn't a good way the check for new videos) and that third party front-ends still work, if they manage to destroy all the third parties apps like reddit i'm out

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryAfter YouTube spent two years piloting Premium Lite, a lower-cost subscription plan for ad-free video viewing in select countries, the platform is pulling the plug on the tier.

In an email to customers, YouTube announced it will no longer offer Premium Lite after October 25th, 2023.

At €6.99 per month, YouTube’s Premium Lite plan first launched in select European countries in 2021, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden.

“While we understand that this may be disappointing news, we continue to work on different versions of Premium Lite as we incorporate feedback from our users, creators and partners.”

The Verge has received several emails from Premium Lite subscribers to our tipline, informing us of their disappointment, while a ResetEra forum discussion is currently growing with other European users lamenting the loss of their service.

Premium Lite may have been a relatively unknown service to many of us living in the US and other regions that never had access, but based on initial reactions to its discontinuation, it seems to be the Goldilocks “just right” level for those who want to skip ads but don’t have any interest in paying more for YouTube Music or downloading videos for offline viewing.


Saved 44% of original text.

[–] BlinkerFluid@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] yhvr@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

The second link you gave is probably malware!

Vanced died after they got a cease and desist from YouTube. You might want to recommend https://revanced.app/ instead, which patches the YouTube APK directly on your phone instead of distributing an APK with modified bytecode (which is the given "reason" YouTube killed Vanced)

ReVanced also has patches to remove ads/crack features for other apps as well, which is an added bonus. They're also open-source

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›