How did Mr Booker vote? I'm just kidding.
this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
668 points (98.8% liked)
politics
22658 readers
5810 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
17 hours later "And that's why I'm voting to keep sending arms to our valued partners in the IDF"
Sales. What sales? So we give these nutbags our tax payer money to them buy arms from us. Let me repeat that again, we gave them 19 billion dollar so that they can buy weapon for us.
Has your government given u any money to spend money in US.
Israel is just getting allowance from US and our hard earned tax money.
Israel is just getting allowance from US and our hard earned tax money.
To conduct a genocide against anyone of Arab appearance or Muslim faith, though. Which is what many people in America genuinely support.
Surprising nobody:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-senate-rejects-effort-block-arms-sales-israel-2025-04-03/
"The Senate voted 82-15 and 83-15 to reject two resolutions of disapproval over sales of massive bombs and other offensive military equipment."
You don't vote against AIPAC. Not if you want to stay in office.
Tell that to Harris.
Who?
Exactly.
If you’re buying the democratic system of a country as big as the US, of course, you’ll allow the illusion of choice. Otherwise, you lose your soft power and your ability to shape the division among the people.
Democrats were never trying to get reelected. They were in on it with the Republicans.
Harris may not have been the mastermind behind such a political strategy, but she was certainly in the know. Biden was senile from the start, anyone with a functioning brain would have expected that running for a second term was doomed from the beginning. They offered no solutions, rushed Harris's campaign without due process, had no meaningful platform, and their endorsements were sickening and outright stupid.
Believing it was a fair election is naive, it’s like believing trump’s words and actions are his own.
There are powerful players in this political game whose names we will never know. They manipulate both sides, using politicians as mere faces to craft an alternative reality that serves their agenda.
We must stop falling into their cheap traps.
Beautifully said
Unfortunately, there are lots of ostriches in this thread who are going to think I'm promoting accelerationism, trump dictatorship, or putin.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's referred to as Escalation of Commitment (at least in business school).
Some people have a really hard time admitting when they've been wrong. Especially if they feel tricked/bamboozled. So instead, they double down with their original premise. In other words, there's just no convincing someone who doesn't have an open mind.
Harris lost because she offered no real economic change. Most voters didn't care about the genocide, or voted for even more genocide. For all we know, Harris might have lost by even more without AIPAC campaign contributions.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(8 replies)
Democrats are never there when it comes to protect their own country, but always there to protect israel.
This resolution is an israeli advertising displaying how efficient AIPAC is and how they own the senate.
Kind of crazy how much noise people make on baseless claims of Trump being a Russian asset, but AIPAC is bragging in broad daylight about their control on US government.
that Will never pass, Americans love when brown people die on mass, especially Christians
view more: next ›