This isn't a scientific article. It only barely qualifies as a metaphysical argument, and that argument is false.
The distinction between quantum and classical physics is not merely one of resolution. If that were the case, then we'd have long since discarded classical physics as we developed the quantum variety.
The problem is gravity, a force so weak that we need an entire planet just to have a place to stand. Scientists are working on an experiment that can prove whether or not gravity is not a quantum field, and I'm quite confident they'll discover that it is not. https://phys.org/news/2024-11-gravity-quantum-entity.html
The problem is that there's no way to quantize gravity in a way that makes sense with our observations of how it works in macroacopic reality. Most attempts at a quantum description of the gravitational field as we understand it immediately blow up into incalculable infinities of gravitons and fail to explain gravitational time dilation at the same time.
I think the correct description of reality will require a perspective which hasn't previously been described in mathematic form. I don't think spacetime/gravity is quantized, I think that's an emergent property of the same underlying process that gave rise to our quantized fields for matter and energy.