this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3581 readers
188 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Will Starmer bend the knee and kiss the ring? The world waits...

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fuck you, Keir. Respond with tarrifs like Canada and EU did. Grow a pair.

[–] GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago

This is a bit pathetic.
And we well know that appeasement of Drumpf achieves nothing; They'll be back on the moment anything vaguely uk-related annoys him.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago

Grab your ankles, Kier.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This speaks to the incredibly short sighted and, let's be honest, incompetence of the civil service and elected governments over a number of years.

Had they been more forceful in expanding the scope of GDS when it started instead of watering it down, the UK government (a huge buyer of US IT) by now would have had a better bargaining chip against this extortion from the Trump administration plus our own infrastructure to rely on. Or had the government created the conditions and championed alternative digital networks (yes they exist look at what we're using right now) they would also be in a better position.

Instead we're in a race to how far we can goatse ourselves for Musk and Trump.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This isn't incompetence. Like every 21st century major "Labor" party, the UK's is a neoliberal corporate whore, and Starmer is at the top.

Remember Brexit? The UK is much closer to fascism, and is more of a plutocracy, than the majority of the EU.

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The secret to a good shit post is to spell the actual party you're trying to malign correctly 😊. Not simply fill your reply with all the buzzwords you can think of.

Neoliberalismo, corporations, fascismo, racista..... That's numberwang!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Nice ad hominem. Care to attack my argument, or would you prefer to continue defending a PM who acts on behalf of the wealthy and corporations; foreign corporations — who have bent the knee to fascism — no less?

[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Corporations, bend the knee, fascism.

That's numberwang!

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

labour in name silence in shame

[–] Fluke@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wonder where the money for that came from?

Fuck you disabled lot, Zuckerberg et al need another yacht.

Rather let disabled people starve than let the richest people in the world face the literal consequences of their own actions — they got Trump elected — if they lose money from tarriffs, thats on them.

[–] Benchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope this is an April fools joke ....

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It was posted on April the 2nd so...

It was also known to be on the table: UK considers big tech tax changes to appease Donald Trump

And it isn't the online thing: UK willing to renegotiate online harm laws to avoid Trump tariffs