this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
346 points (98.6% liked)

Academia

922 readers
29 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

now it's on the voters to make some democrats disappear.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 7 points 1 day ago

They didn't used to be this way, for some reason under Biden they went super anti-immigration

[–] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 2 days ago

"No way to prevent this, say the Democrats who are actively collaborating with the fascists"

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 107 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Between the House and the Senate, there are currently 258 Democrats in Congress.

And 224 of them are fascist collaborators.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Dems just making sure the 2 party system dies forever.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Or maybe more accurately, the illusion of a two-party system.

[–] ChaoticCookie@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

When I said I didn’t want a 2 party system, this isn’t what I meant!

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 60 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The dnc is controlled opposition. We have to get actual progressives elected at local levels and it’ll be a fucking process but it’ll eventually make the party actual opposition

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You'll have to throw Chuck Schumer into a retirement home (or a volcano) first.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It’s seeming like it, fucking ghouls run the dnc

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We've been doing pretty good at that in Oregon in the Portland area especially, we got a fair few DSA people elected to the city council and to the state house in the last election. Although I doubt that will ever really convert the Dems into an actual progressive party, it's a lot more likely that the Democratic party dies with the rise of new progressive candidates and new progressive parties winning.

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That’s awesome, it’s been like that in St. Louis too at the local level but can’t break past that. If a new party is what’s really needed though, then ideas need to get agreed and things need to become more centralized, I’m seeing like 50 different progressive parties lately and that fragmentation will get us no where

[–] WarlordSdocy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I mean at least from what I've seen of it so far DSA is a fairly good choice, as I think for a party to be really progressive and represent the working class people it needs to be run democratically with party members actually having a voice and vote on what the party does. Which so far most other parties tend to follow the normal party strategy with party leadership and candidates making choices about what policies they want which just seems like a path to another Democratic party down the line that is disconnected from the people.

I think if anything though fragmentation isn't really the problem with breaking past local wins. I think it's more that the higher up you get the more corporate money starts to have a large impact and the harder and more support you need to run a grass roots campaign. The higher up you get the harder it becomes to reach out directly to voters through door knocking and events and the more advertisements and mass media campaigns tend to have influence which is where corporate money thrives. I think the way around this outside of campaign finance reform is building up that local support so you can have those local candidates that have already done outreach directly with their local constituents provide support and endorsement towards electing people at higher levels.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And until we get people willing to talk about who is controlling the dnc and why (the zionist) then the dnc will remain trapped in other peoples pockets fwith no conceivable end in sight.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The Democratic party is a party of cowards.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago

Most politicians are cowards.

[–] derryt@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Sigh, I see I can't trust my senator to do the right thing anymore. Edit: meaning he didn't sign it. POS trader.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago

Just shows how cowardly the Democrats are now. Most of them were afraid to sign a piece of paper that means literally nothing.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 19 points 2 days ago
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 2 days ago

My state included 9.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

sad as fuck.