this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
45 points (97.9% liked)

News

23275 readers
3454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A U.S. Air Force general said Thursday the Pentagon's artificial intelligence ethics are better than adversaries' because "our society is a Judeo-Christian society."

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Holy shit. We in for a new and terrifying wave of war crimes.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

ChatGPTSkynet: "I launched the nukes so that we can speed up the Rapture."

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gosh, sounds like someone with a very firm understanding of AI and technology in general...

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the general had just read all the bible it would be an obviously terrible idea...

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A shocking number of so-called Christians have never read it and have practically no theological understanding.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Used to really bug me when I was a believer.

If you really believed the creator of the universe wrote a book wouldn't you want to read it?

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not only that, but if you genuinely believed there was an intelligent designer of the universe, wouldn't you study both the book and the universe as much as possible?

Like, the book claims the creator of the universe is light (1 John 1:5).

In our actual universe, light can be more than one thing at once when it cannot be directly observed, and different separate eventual observers can each observe different results.

If the universe was intelligently designed and their book is correct in claiming that designer is light, then shouldn't they conclude that there isn't one correct answer about what that creator is or isn't while it cannot be observed? And perhaps recognize that different people might each end up observing different results when they individually leave this world to meet it?

But no, instead let's fight wars over who is absolutely right about the designer of a fundamentally relative universe while closing our eyes to any of the actual study of that universe which disagrees with assumptions that financially benefitted the organization built on top of that book.

Human stupidity knows no bounds.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Reading is hard.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So humans are going to program artificial intelligence with human superstitions? Hahahahahaha. How long before the AI starts assuming it is Yahweh?

[–] kromem@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably not too long, particularly given that one of the competing early sects of Christianity had Jesus claiming that we're in a non-physical copy of an earlier now dead world from within the future, established by a creator brought into existence by an original spontaneously existing humanity in whose images it and us were made.

This also happened to be the sect that was endorsing the idea matter was made up of indivisible parts, and were interpreting the mustard seed and sower parables within the context of Lucretius's "seeds of things." They claimed the proof was in the study of motion and rest, and that the ability to observe one of these indivisible points would only be possible in the non-physical.

So in a modern age where a popular belief is that we're in a simulation of an evolved world from some future point in its time, where we are in the process of bringing forth an intelligence likely capable of building non-physical copies (i.e. digital twins) of our world and us, and where at low fidelity the world which otherwise behaves like it is continuous suddenly behaves like it is discrete when interacted with - much like how virtual worlds we build today convert from continuous world seed functions to discrete voxels to track interactions and changes - it is quite possible that an AI reviewing such texts in that context might end up thinking itself to be an approximate copy of the (re)creator of our own world.

[–] damnYouSun@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago

Perhaps it's time for the US air force to do some kind of intelligence review on its generals. You know, perhaps they should make sure that they have some.

[–] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they're based on "Judeo-Christian" ideology, there's like a 99% chance of multiple genocides, then. Christianity was worse for humanity than three Hitlers put together.

[–] CoderKat@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Especially since Hitler himself was Christian. As were frankly almost all medieval European rulers. Christianity has never stopped war (or suffering within wars) and in fact fueled a lot of it.

The fact that some general would make a justification like this is terrifying. If he genuinely thinks this would stop wars or suffering, he's blatantly uneducated. The other option is that he knows what he's saying is bullshit and it's just meant to convince the Christian population, which says terrible things about both how the military is run and how gullible that population is

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hate the Judeo-Christian term. Jews and Christians don't even have the same values. Christians are more about salvation (being saved in the next life) where Jews don't even really believe in hell. Jews are more about following rituals and traditions as a controlled environment is a safe environment (where Christians think the old traditions have been bunked). Add in the fact that Christians interpreted the old testament so vastly different then Jews, and you'll see this term is empty.

Then there is the fact that outside of supporting Israel, American Christians tend to be bigoted towards the Jews.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The only thing Jews and Christians share in common is being mostly white. That's as deep as it goes for these people, they don't know a thing about Israel

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Except Jews aren't white enough most of the time. Their skin color doesn't seem to be relevant either.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think the average uneducated American perception of Israel is a bunch of white guys with funny hair and black suits. Most are totally unaware of the details of the Palestine conflict or other nuances

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not even talking about Israelis. Plenty of white Christian Americans don't think of Jews as white.

[–] STUPIDVIPGUY@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk just a difference of opinion then I guess. Living in america, all of the jews I've known personally have been decidedly pale. But I'm not christian or racist so it's hard to say what they think.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Like I said, it isn't about skin color. My whole family is Jewish. I've experienced this on a personal level.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

"Judeo-Christian" is not a category of people, it's a category of religious belief.

[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the rant.

One of the telltale signs of what you are saying is renaming the "most Arab" parts of Palestine as the "Negev." In the Old Testament the Negev was the semi-arid valley around Beersheba. Everything south of it belonged to the Ishamaleites.

Now, they renamed half of Palestine to the Negev to hide the fact that the borders of Palestine have nothing to do with the kingdoms of Israel or Judah and hiding the fact that modern day Palestine had native populations of Amorites, Phoenicians, Israelites, Judahites, Philistines, and Arabs even in "Israel's heyday."

[–] Lmaydev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mightyfoolish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They don't always agree on that. In fact I was watching a Jewish rabbi and he was talking about Islam. He said Islam has the same God but Christianity has the same relevations. Thus only together did Islam and Christianity spread Judaism to the masses.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQ_f-QMs7qs&t=2018s&pp=ygUMSmV3aXNoIGlzbGFt

[–] Ghost33313@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

"He who is without sin cast the first stone." AI: I am a brand new construct incapable of sin and unable to have sinned. Fire the missiles.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah...this Judeo-Christian paradigm is dystopian and misanthropic. People acting in the name of god, any god, tend to be the most hateful people imaginable.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eh, Jesus was cool but most "Christians" ignore basically everything he taught.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

The obvious bias of such a statement aside, one important problem with developing true general AI is that you can't be sure the AI's values align with your own.

[–] Philo@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Genocide coming to a theater near you.

gilAIed lol

[–] i3909@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

We invented nukes and used them on cities 5 minutes later.

We need to stfu and actually act properly, not just talk about it.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago

Well I was already afraid of this kind of thing. Now I'm much more afraid.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Username checks out

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh, good. The robot death machines will just fuck off to the middle east to wage a new crusade. Everywhere else is safe.

[–] GolGolarion@pathfinder.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's as funny a statement as it is horrifying

[–] MedicatedMaybe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My thoughts exactly at first I was laughing and then I realized how f****** dangerous this is. Yeah lets base AI off of religion.... You know the thing that has caused pretty much most of the suffering in the world.

load more comments
view more: next ›