this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
947 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22543 readers
4485 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Lawmakers from both parties expressed outrage after The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief revealed he was accidentally included in a Trump administration Signal chat discussing Yemen airstrikes.

Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.) and Rep. Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) called for investigations and firings, labeling it a serious security breach.

Rep. Don Bacon (R-Neb.) criticized the use of non-secure systems, warning that adversaries like Russia and China could exploit it.

Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) condemned the administration's mishandling of classified information, saying it endangers national security.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago

Democrats..."Why I oughta...If I only...boy oh boy are you ever...sigh".

[–] velvetylogic@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago

The worst thing is aside from being inept and careless, there is no chance they aren't selling secrets to anyone willing to pay.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They only have themselves to blame. If you're actively destroying OPSEC you have no reason to fucking cry.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Living in the imperial core where a chat error is far bigger scandal than a genocide.

[–] kava@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

well said. I'm surprised at the reaction towards this specific event.

the administration is purging the federal government, rerouting tens of thousands of federal agents to enforce immigration (literally 80% of ATF is now focused on immigration. DEA, FBI, IRS, and more are all being recruited to help with immigration), illegally ignoring court orders, using a Stasi-like group of unmarked federal agents to intimidate with threats of criminal prosecution and force people into compliance (look at what happened at the SS office or the non-profit U.S. Institute of Peace), giving executive orders that are blatantly and explicitly unconstitutional (like the one to end birthright citizenship)

that isn't even starting to mention the genocide happening in Palestine that is not only being condoned but openly embraced. we are arresting and attempting to deport individuals whose only crime is that they are anti-Israel. permanent residents are being denied entry into the country because they have a photo of a Hezbollah leader on their phone

the administration is using coercion and threats to force over 60 universities (Colombia being the most visible) to change the things they are teach, abandon certain policies, suppress student speech, and dramatically increase police presence. all in the name of fighting "anti-semitism"

it has only been a couple of months and right now Congress is making a stink about a text message

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

How dare you let the proles know we're bombing people for no good reason?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FireAtWill@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I agree with those who think nothing will happen. Screw ups are an everyday thing for these clowns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think the important thing here is to not get distracted and focus on what's really important:

Hillary's emails.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cue schumer saying that we shouldn't be hasty and should focus on bipartisan bills instead.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Nah, this is the kind of thing that gets Democrat leadership animated: stuff that barely affects voters.

[–] Ironfist@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago

"should" is the key word. Trump should be in prison but he's not.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Rebember when thebRepublicans had one investigation after another aboutbher private email server, even though nothing ever happened, previous Republican SoSs had done the same thing, and EVERY Republican onvestigation found she did nothing wrong.

Now the Republicans have done something a million times more dangerous, did it on an unsecure pplatform, and even incompetently invited a fucking reporter to read it all.

This is the chance to treat Republicans EXACTLY the same way they treat Democrats. EVERY Democrat should bite into this like a hungry dawg, and NEVER let go. Bring it up constantly, Gorilla Glue this to Hegseth, Vance, Gabbard, and the rest of those MAGA Traitors. They need to hear about, and be asked about this every single day, all day, for as long as they hold office.

And Dems shoupd never give up their demands that these people be terminated and prosecuted for their breach of security.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Necroscope0@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Russia and China could exploit it? They were probably in the fucking chat too they just did not write an article about it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

They've got nearly four more years left to completely screw something up.

They keep messing with things eventually they'll cause catastrophe

[–] heavyboots@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh, so they're upset now? What about, you know, when Trump stole a shit-ton of top secret documents that he very probably attempted to sell and at the very least definitely stored improperly and used a lot of lying and juggling to keep hold of? After he attempted to overthrow the government on Jan 6th. If they had moved faster, we wouldn't even be having this whine-fest, because he wouldn't have gotten re-elected from prison.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago

If this is the thing that makes people realize Trump and his cronies are fucking idiots, despite all the other evidence we already have, I'll take it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Betazed@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago

I read the Axios piece and skimmed the Atlantic original. This is some next level incompetence from this administration. It's bad enough that I actually hope that it's intentional as some kind of dick wagging move.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago
[–] Ronno@feddit.nl 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's bad and all, but: They are using Signal?!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago

As a Democratic Leader I think we should EXCUSE this Leaking of Top Secret War Information and INSTEAD Focus on HER EMAILS to win BACK Democratic Voters!

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›