A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
The false morel contains gyromitrin, a toxin that sickens some number of foragers around the world every year; half of the ALS victims in Montchavin reported a time when they had acute mushroom poisoning. And according to Spencer, the human body may also metabolize gyromitrin into a compound that, over time, might lead to similar DNA damage as cycad seeds.
Fascinating.
Bruh, Gyromitra esculenta has been known to be toxic for decades. These people have literally been poisoning themselves. You might think they're tasty, but they're not so tasty as to be worth ALS.
Sure it's toxic, but not to ME
I can change her
The morel of the story is...
Yeh, there’s not mushroom for interpretation.
You seem like a fungi
That’s nice to hear. Usually I need to grow on people.
I know what you mean, can be a real truffle sometimes
Amanita minute to get ready for some real talk in this thread.
I lichen you guys.
False, there is no morel
Underrated
I feel like nothing good comes from mushroom foraging yourself unless you’re an expert. Seems very risky.
My mycology professor in university told us he had a doctorate in mushrooms and still wouldn't ever forage for wild ones
I still remember that X-files episode where they were investigating a mind controlling fungi that released a mind altering spore if you inhaled it.
Your mycology professor sounds like they've not really experience outdoors as much as in a city (and specifically a classroom).
I was picking shrooms around the same time I got my first puukko, so idk, four to five years of age.
The implication was that some of the lookalikes are impossible to identify and wildly dangerous
If an edible variety has any lookalikes that similar that can be found in your climate zone, you need to steer clear from it. This isn't the case for all varieties and all areas though. General mushroom foraging may be dangerous, but certain species can be safely selected, due to not having lookalikes you need to be worried about.
Which these are requires learning specific to your local area though. The skills do not transfer to other regions, and everything you know would need to be reconfirmed if you moved anywhere new.
Exactly. There's a reason I won't eat any Amanita: the similarity of edible and deadly species in that genus makes them the main source of mushroom fatalities in North America.
By contrast, messing up a bolete ID is likely to result in a meal that is too bitter to eat. That's a much more acceptable risk.
Well A muscaria is rather easy to identify, but it's not really a cooking shroom.
What the earlier dude is what I meant, and why foraging for shrooms is safe as houses if you get taught by a person who has foraged mushrooms in that habitat and knows what's safe to pick and what isn't.
Which is why it's easy enough to teach to pre-school children in certain places. Like here.
It's not the same everywhere, ofc.
Looking at the wiki page for gyromitra, it looks like it's sold for consumption in Finland. Were you taught it was safe to eat?
Oh no.
https://fi.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korvasieni this one
We call it "the ear mushroom", and while it was highly priced and I was taught to look for them, I was also taught it's poisonous and has to be.. (one moment I don't have the English term for a thing, this hasn't happened in a while, but I don't cook mushrooms so) blanched (oh wait really? In Finnish there's a specific term blanching that is imo mostly only used in context of shrooms "ryöppäys") for three times, iirc. Edit I checked and you boil them, blanching is more a short term thing but the Finnish term is bendy but anyway I was taught they are poison but also good eatin. At least Twice for five minutes, changing the water in between to fresh and then discarding it. Three parts water to one part shrooms at least.
So yeah. It's a priced and edible mushroom, but also it is poisonous. For no reason I assume Japanese people might talk to their kids about blowfish in much the same way my dad talked about korvasieni. As in you'd let the kid know not to eat it, but also talk about how good it would be to eat one.
I don't think I've ever even had any.
That sounds similar to lupin beans.
In America, we have pokeweed, which everyone knows is toxic, but people eat it after boiling 3 times (I don't think we have another word for that).
A lot of foraging books talk about boiling and/or soaking to make things edible, but usually it's to remove bitterness/astringency like with acorns. For something neurotoxic, I don't think I'd trust it, though.
Or maybe he thought that was the wisest thing to tell a group of 18-20somthings. Not a demographic known for cool deliberation or self preservation. There's a reason the draft starts at 18 but you can't rent a car til you're 25.
So they decided to lie about not foraging for mushrooms?
Doesn't really make sense to me.
Honestly, a professor of mycology not being able yo to forage mushrooms? Just where do these people live that there's no solid edible shrooms which have no fatal similar looking ones, like chanterelles or winter chanterelles?
Idk, maybe in the US there's similar species in areas with them so it's kind of a gamble, but we don't, so foraging is a-okay.
As long as you know how and what to forage for in the specific area you are, you should know whether you can or can't forage edible shrooms easily.
I wouldn't be certain I've found penny buns although I know how to ID them, roughly, but because of the phenotypical variation and not remembering all the strains which are similar, I wouldn't confidently forage those. I don't recall there being anything too poisonous that's close to it, but still.
Murica
If you know what you're doing, you get incredible deliciousness.
There are plenty of forageable mushrooms with no look-alikes. If you're cautious and thorough, it's not particularly risky.
And by thorough, I mean:
And these days, that means making sure it's a book written by someone who knows what they are doing, rather than AI auto-generated bullshit.
It's the same as using wild herbs. You have to really know what you're doing. It's not impossible to learn, though. First you need to know an expert and learn some basic species that are hard to misidentify. Then you can just stop there or continue.
False morel, despite the name, is not really something you'd confuse for a morel. If the only description I gave you of a morel was 1 sentence long, maybe you'd grab a false morel by accident, but if you've ever seen a picture, or any longer description than that, you wouldn't confuse them.
These people know which mushroom they are foraging.
I'd be surprised if this was the case, but:
Does this mean that ALS is entirely caused by external factors like the chemicals found in these mushrooms?
Better still, is it entirely caused by these mushrooms?
If so, that's amazing news for humanity.
Definitely not 100% external. A chunk of cases are known to be genetic.
And these people were eating a mushroom known to be mildly poisonous.
Scary stuff! 😱