this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
16 points (86.4% liked)

Buy European

4742 readers
753 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat

Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Matrix:

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:

Banner credits: BYTEAlliance

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
maam@feddit.uk
alex@jlai.lu
circledot@feddit.org
Argyle13@lemmy.world
Sunshine@feddit.is
Sunshine@lemmy.ca
buyeuropean@lemmy.ca
buyeuropean@feddit.org
lazycog@feddit.uk
16
Is an alternative to nginx worth considering? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 week ago by 0x0@programming.dev to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The source code for nginx is hosted in the US, BSD-licensed and has the american F5.com as the primary maintainer, sponsor, and steward of NGINX.

In 2022 some of the developers forked it into Angie, the code of which is hosted in the US as well.

In 2024 one of the lead developers forked nginx into freenginx due to F5's interference, bringing it more in line with its initial grassroots origin. They have a self-hosted Mercurial repo (and a mirror in the US) and the domain seems to be controlled by the lead developer.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] philluminati@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If an app is open source why does it matter who controls it?

If an app is in Git, then you have a fully copy locally, so why does it matter who hosts it?

Git is and was absolutely decentralised by nature. Everyone can have their competely independent copy of the copy and can send diffs/patches as emails, text files, whatever.

Thereโ€™s no concept of a central server in Git. GitHub is not the center of git. There is no Center.

Then because most young devs couldnโ€™t properly understand git and weโ€™re too lazy to learn, you all adopted a pattern called โ€œrebasingโ€ which has now become gits default. It plays into the idea that GitHub is the single source of truth when it need not be.

Anyway thereโ€™s an off topic git rant for you.

[โ€“] 0x0@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago

I know git โ‰  github.com.
I also know legal jurisdictions play a role in life, especially lately.
Thankfully the license is permissive and i've been preferring freenginx, but i was curious to know others' opinions.

[โ€“] chameleon@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

I don't think it really makes a lot of sense to look for FOSS alternatives based on country of maintainer origin when it's something popular enough to be shipped by a lot of independent Linux distros and supported by local IT consultants in more or less any country. That said, to my knowledge, lighttpd is mostly German in origin and is actively maintained. It definitively lost to nginx in the great popularity contest but I don't think it's really any worse.

[โ€“] banghida@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There are better web servers anyways

[โ€“] Blaze@feddit.nl 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Such as?

[โ€“] banghida@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Caddy

[โ€“] yojimbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd say comparing caddy to nginx is like comparing bicycle to a diesel locomotive. Technically they are doing same thing. One is easy to deal with the other one is designed to do things at scale.

[โ€“] coldsideofyourpillow@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't call Caddy "better". It's what I prefer, but (at least back when I tried it) nginx still has some features that Caddy lacks.

[โ€“] philluminati@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

I donโ€™t think so