this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2025
87 points (96.8% liked)

Linux

52451 readers
474 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have been looking for an email client on Linux after being tired of Gmail and Outlook web clients.

I had Thunderbird installed on my system and thought I'd give it a spin. I set up POP for my email accounts and it worked fantastic... For a total of 2 hours, after which I realised that searching in Thunderbird is simply not going to work for me. I need to search by attachment name and sometimes even by text inside attachment and unfortunately Thunderbird can't do that (I think I tried an extension too but it made the UI super clunky to the point that I couldn't even understand how to navigate it anymore).

Does Betterbird or any other email client fix this problem? I'm willing to try other options if they are FOSS.

Thanks

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiny@midwest.social 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I use evolution and it works well for everything besides my work Gmail but that has more to do with security policies than evolution

[–] jcarax@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

I was pleasantly surprised with Evolution the last time I tried to use Gnome, it used to be a buggy, bloated mess. But alas, I can't manage to use Gnome for more than a release or two. Now I'm looking for a decent Wayland native alternative to Thunderbird, but it just doesn't exist without DE bloat at this point. Maybe someone will build a modern replacement for Sylpheed/Claws.

[–] bluefishcanteen@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I have had the exact same issue as you. Thunderbird is great, but their attachment search is not. I spent a lot of time looking for a way to make it work and what I settled on is using a third party program to serve this function: Recoll (https://www.recoll.org/index.html).

It should be available in your distro's package repository.

You'll need to download your messages to your computer, but it will work in the way that you expect search to work (I.e. search by filename, search by text within attachments, search by text within emails). Setup is straightforward. You just need to point it to the Thunderbird profile directory where your emails are saved. As a bonus, you get good desktop search for all the other files on your computer too.

Sadly (don't throw anything at me), the only desktop email program that I have found that does search properly is Outlook desktop. On Linux, that is obviously a non-starter.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I might try this. Or maybe I can use grep lol. We'll see how it fits in my workflow, I'm comfortable in the CLI but haven't really entertained the idea a CLI email client before. Thanks

[–] bluefishcanteen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Recoll (thankfully) has a GUI. It isn't the prettiest app, but it was easy to set up and I've otherwise quite happy with it.

Just coming back to say that I'm loving recoll. I've set up Thunderbird to download everything with POP and I've pointed recoll at the profile directory. Since Recoll also seems to be able to read PDFs, it is giving me amazing results at blazing speeds. Honestly if there was a decent application to just pull down email with POP I probably wouldn't even open thunderbird other than to reply to stuff

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] lemminator@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I learned about mutt ~12 years ago, and it changed my email-interface forever

all mutt, all the time

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

hows the search fuction in mutt? For eg, if i want to search an email thread from like 3 months ago, does it function well or do I need to open my broswer....

[–] lemminator@lemmy.today 1 points 4 days ago

It works great. I never open a browser to search for mail: http://mutt.postle.net/searching/

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How has your experience been with Mutt? I've heard about neomutt from a lot of people but I'm honestly a bit intimidated to move to a completely CLI-based email client especially because it's another configuration file which I'll need to be mindful of

[–] Earflap@reddthat.com 2 points 5 days ago

I really liked the client but HTML emails are a real pain in the ass.

[–] wwwgem@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

You may find what you need here or there.

Like @a14o@feddit.org I would personaly recommend the power of neomutt and notmuch, but it's not a GUI option if that's what you're looking for.

[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Claws searches reasonably quickly and unlike thunderbird it isn't a total resource hog. OTOH it suffers from not being multi threaded, which means when you first install it, expect it to take literally hours before it finishes syncing all your emails.

Mutt is not multi threaded either. Only thunderbird and kmail are, and kmail is a buggy mess, while thunderbird eats your ram like it's a plate of cheese danishes.

[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I've settled for using Thunderbird for POP + Recoll for search. I can't believe how good Recoll is; in my opinion this is even better than Gmail's search in their Web GUI. I will be using Recoll for a lot more things now, but my immediate need for search has been fixed for now. Though running Thunderbird just for downloading emails does seem a bit overkill. We'll see

[–] kittenroar@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago

If it works, it works -- glad you found a way

[–] unknown_user@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago
[–] ndupont@feddit.uk 1 points 5 days ago

Why not Roundcube ?

[–] mintberrycrunch@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Geary or Mailspring are the best options. Neither is perfect. I lean toward Geary.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

I used mailspring for about 6 months because I love the idea and it looks beautiful. But when you check the forums you see people are complaining about major bugs that seemed to remain unfixed for eternity, developer never comments.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

I like mainspring but I can’t get my corporate outlook account to work with it

[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Oof

You do you, but some of us don't miss 1995

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 6 days ago

Looks fine to me! ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯

[–] dukatos@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

Buggy as hell 😐

[–] bubbalouie@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

sudo apt install claws-mail

Fast, reliable, insanely functional - weird formats. Yes it has a calendar, works great.

[–] christian@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago

Over ten years ago I was looking for a foss email client and I was really hesitant on claws because the interface looked ridiculously dated, but settled on it anyway because it seemed the most appropriate for me out of what was available.

The interface has received zero facelifts since then, but it's grown to become endearing because the software has been fantastic and reliable for years. I don't need a lot of bells and whistles in an email client, so maybe it's missing features others might want, but it does everything I care about and needs minimal setup.

[–] databender@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

nmh is the way

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I use Betterbird as my main email client so I tried out the attachment searching. Searching by attachment name seemed to work well, but it doesn't look like it searches for the text within the documents, at least not for PDFs. Not sure if there's like an OCR extension or anything that would do it, but yeah just the base Betterbird install doesn't do it as far as I can see.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (11 children)

I've always liked Thunderbird. Geary is also nice. Not sure if it can attachment search.

You can filter messages with attachment on Thunderbird btw

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] a14o@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Where indexing and searching mails is concerned, notmuch is the best I've seen. Do note that this is not an e-mail client, it only indexes, tags and searches (following the "UNIX philosophy" of doing one job well).

I personally use it with neomutt as a mail user agent, which is almost certainly not what you want. Notmuch supports other clients but they're all pretty arcane.

So this is not a recommendation, just a glimpse into advanced e-mail setups I guess.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 4 points 6 days ago

this is one of the things that struck me about email clients on Linux – CLI and GUI clients have followed two very different evolutionary paths – the CLI clients went for the “doing one job well” path (where you end up assembling a whole system of apps for sending and receiving email) and the GUI clients went for the “everything and the kitchen sink” path (where you end up trying to hide half the options so they don’t get in your way)

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've been having a grand time with sylpheed.

Mostly because thunderbird changed its presentation layout and i took it personally. Plus sylpheed is lighter weight.

[–] ISOmorph@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Last stable version is over 7 years old. Ouch...

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Sylpheed has all the features I would expect an email client to have, and they all work. No reason to change anything, unless email as a technology changes, or it stops building.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is why no-one in the right mind uses Sylpheed, but the actively maintained fork Claws Mail (which just recently had a new version released).

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sylpheed handles large amounts of email much better. It's fast even at 50k plus emails. Last time I tried Claws Mail, it choked on that.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Edge cases are not the norm, though.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm not so sure that it is an edge case. I'm just an average person. I'm sure there are many people who have reason to receive and/or save much larger volumes of email than I do. Regardless, it's always better to have software that works well under a wide range of circumstances.

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

On my company mail account I have collected circa 10000 mails during the past 10 years, which is circa 80 mails a month - and that is a lot.

If you're not following multiple high-volume mailing lists since a decade and archive every single e-mail I don't think its normal to have 50000 mails in a mailbox.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›