this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1779 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

11252 readers
1719 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BullishUtensil@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago

There are two schools of thought:

Those who want as good life as possible, and Those who want to have a better life than everyone else, no matter what.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

The fact that Cathy has a blue check mark proves Twitter is fucking stupid.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 12 points 11 hours ago

My company acquired a division that had a great union and we all got more vacation days. Woot!

[–] auginator@lemmy.world 19 points 15 hours ago

I got higher at position as senior. But It wasn’t until I was able to join the Union that my income doubled. Year before I joined like in 2007 manager gave me a .10 raise. This shit is real.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 33 points 16 hours ago

When somebody insists, "X doesn't matter because my salary depends on X," it's time to stop beating your head against a wall to teach them anything.

[–] slappypantsgo@lemm.ee 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty soon we won’t be able to trust BLS data, which is frightening.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

The BLS data has historically been a method by which capitalists measured and managed labor power as a fungible resource. It has historically been a tool of capital to evaluate the influence of policy on labor, not a tool of labor to pressure capital for concessions.

Not to say the information isn't valuable on its face. But it should be worth recognizing that we are looking at autocannibalization of capital. The people most injured by dismantling the BLS are the people who do the bulk of the hiring, not the people being hired.

[–] Itzdan@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

Yeah Cathy, sheesh

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 59 points 21 hours ago

Lol the fact that she even has a contract at all is because of unions.

[–] varjen@lemmy.world 105 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Together we bargain, alone we beg.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This needs to be on a fucking t-shirt.

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 11 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Sure. Have your pro Union T-shirt. And what better place to buy it from than

https://www.amazon.com/Union-Workers-Bargain-Collectively-T-Shirt/dp/B08XHYS16W

Speacial offer for Prime Members: Order today and get to watch the first 30 Minutes of Fightclub Ad-free.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 4 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Because unions don't have merch or produce anything they might want to promote amirite

[–] Gloomy@mander.xyz 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Ah, might be my wired humor kicking in. I just found it hilarious to find that T-shirt on Amazon of all things. It's like a Butcher selling Vegan cakes. Amazon is like the Anti-Thesis to Unions, but happy to make a buck selling the line.

It felt like a "discount etsy agitprop" moment to me. Just shows how ridiculous capitalis is, realy.

But than again, I am wired sometimes. My humour doesn't always translate. Oh well.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 1 points 11 hours ago

"wired". lol.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 2 points 12 hours ago

God damn it, Cathy, you lush.

load more comments
view more: next ›