this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
351 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21977 readers
4283 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

So much for encouraging local economy. Now all fruits and veggies will come from Mexico and frozen 😂

[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The first administration fucked over farmers with tariffs and then bailed them out. Trillions of dollars are being grifted to rich. They'll chip in a few meager billions to farmers again.

Besides they hated when Obama tried to give kids healthy meals. I'm sure they be overjoyed that kids don't have to eat the woke fresh foods.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The same folks who freaked out when Obama said they'd have to eat their veggies and screaming "No Pain, No Gain" now.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thanks to gymbro brainrot, nowadays all forms of vegetables are seen as "carbs", which they think makes people fat from just looking at them, so only minimal vegetables for your unseasoned chicken.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Bro all you need is protein. Ignore the fact I get lightheaded when I stand i just need more GAAAINS

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

America first! Lol

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 75 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I'm hopeful this will all lead to America's farmers breaking from the republican party.

I fear american farmers will go bankrupt and all their land will be bought by corporations.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago

american farmers will go bankrupt and all their land will be bought by corporations.

We're already past that. Something like 6 companies own the vast majority of US agriculture. And they're not run by farmers but hedgies and the like, who have been setting up illegal monopolies while the feds do nothing about it on account of extreme bribery.

[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 37 points 1 day ago

I fear american farmers will go bankrupt and all their land will be bought by corporations.

That's already kinda the case that's been happening in slow motion. Various policies over the last several decades have driven family farmers out of business to be replaced with bigger and bigger companies.

[–] podperson@lemm.ee 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Farmers sure do love voting Conservative, despite the fact that it negatively impacts them. The mistake is bringing logic into a discussion like this.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

The farmers and the military vets probably high five each other just before the leopards come

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Yeah, and then they'll just blame it on woke

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That’s literally the plan. It’s also why vail and ikon been buying up snow trails since the 80s/90s

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man they sure like fucking over farmers, guess Soviet-style wreckage of agriculture by the government was on the Putin "to do" list.

[–] NimdaQA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Soviet-style wreckage of agriculture by the government was on the Putin “to do” list.

At least the Ural-Siberian method actually had a reason to be implemented and the NEP/capitalist alternative was a disaster.

America meanwhile already has a working agriculture system and Trump is just shredding it needlessly to pieces.

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Aren't the tariffs meant to be in place to stimulate the internal economy? These orders are starting to look a lot like high treason.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The intent is to destroy America at the behest of his master, Putin.

[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's definitely where my head is going. I cannot for the life of me think of a reasonable alternative.

[–] Shapillon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

He is a dumb fuck who's dense enough to have an event horizon. Add the narcissism, possible dementia, and a general lack of anything remotely human.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Said to? Yes. Meant to? No.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, markets are supposed to be free! Can't be propping up uncompetitive businesses (unless they're owned by cronies).

Crony capitalism!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

No, that's a lie they tell you because 1. Trump is a fucking idiot, and 2. The truth gives him what wants which is to exploit America fir his own narcissism. It's a wonder he doesn't just call it Trumpland Inc.

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Prudent planning. Just preparing for the dust bowl.

Learning the hard way the E in DEI was helping them.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please sir, can I have some more?

[–] liverbe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Let them eat cake!

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why the hell would you need a grant to allow that? Can’t they buy from whoever they please?

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Think of it more as a farm-to-table addition that was the only source of real fruits and vegetables.

Now going forward, everything will come from the back of a truck, previously frozen.

Let's not even get into who's making money off it now. I'm already too depressed.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Still don’t understand why they were or are prohibited from buying those vegetables.

Are they just saying it’s now more expensive without the grant?

[–] Dnb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

Yes most likely it's more expensive to buy high quality food. They were given a grant to cover the higher cost, but required to buy local and thus support their community.