this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3475 readers
107 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
tom@feddit.uk
GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
flamingos@feddit.uk
frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
15
30,000 jobs could go in Labour’s radical overhaul of NHS (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 14 hours ago by RubberDuck@lemmy.world to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

This is such a misleading headline.

The Tories created NHS England in 2012, basically an independently ran management layer for the NHS. Labour is bringing it back under government control.

There was a lot of extra bureaucracy by adding this additional 'NHS England' layer, with a lot of nurses in particular hired to do it.

Yes, a lot of these people's administrative/management jobs will no longer be needed, but it's very likely a great deal of these people (who again are predominantly nurses) will be hired by the (government-ran) NHS.

I'm not surprised to see the Mail, Express, and Telegraph spin this news as Labour scrapping the NHS or mass sacking NHS workers, but I'm sad to see the Guardian doing the same.

[–] MoonManKipper@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Agreed, this has the potential to be a very good thing for the NHS

[–] JMorningstar@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why is everyone so anti progress?

[–] davesmith@feddit.uk 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone is not 'anti-progress', unless the 'progress' you mean is the type we see Elon Musk engaging in in the US.

But wait, the combination of 'austerity' and privatisation both parties (red and blue Tory) have engaged in for decades now is exactly a slow-paced what Musk is speed-running in the US. And the UK gradually moves down the global affluence tables while the rich get richer because of it.

So I guess maybe that is why everyone is so anti 'progress'. You just forgot the necessary quotation marks around the work 'progress'.

[–] RubberDuck@lemmy.world -4 points 14 hours ago

Party for the workers /s