this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
99 points (99.0% liked)

World News

43854 readers
3149 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump announced a planned 200% tariff on French and EU alcoholic beverages in response to the European Union’s decision to reinstate tariffs on American whiskey.

Trump accused the EU of unfair trade practices and demanded an immediate reversal of its 50% whiskey tariff.

The EU’s move is part of broader retaliation against U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs.

The dispute has rattled liquor stocks, with major European brands like LVMH and Remy Cointreau dropping, while U.S. alcohol stocks, including Jack Daniels' parent Brown-Forman, also declined.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[Some]Americans: Vote for Donald Trump because they're upset about the high cost of living

Trump: Does everything in his power to increase the cost of ...everything

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

That’s the annoying part of this. Prices never creep down the same way they creep up. So things will always be more expensive. The only way it ever corrects is very violently in a massive depression and even that never fully corrects it.

[–] rxbudian@lemmy.ca 4 points 19 hours ago

Ship more to Canada, Mexico and the rest of the world...

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

And there is zero resistance from the entirety of the rest of the US, there is no one there able to see how these are acts of self destruction on a very large scale and the reputational damage is becoming irreversible.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Took his sweet time to realize he could put +100% tariffs.

It's fine tho, we'll sell our high quality liquors to other markets. See? The problem with putting tariffs to the whole world is that the whole world answers in kind. But only against you, wno started the tariffs. We can sell our liquors to Asia, to Canada or to Australia just fine. But your whiskey is right now nuclear waste; nobody wants it.

[–] Someone@lemmy.ca 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I wish more people would understand this perspective. Americans might be picking a fight with the whole world, but the rest of the world only has to worry about 1 country picking a fight with them.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 hours ago

And the world restructures its trading away from the US; they come out fine eventually but the US loses money and influence.

[–] sloppychops@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read somewhere that the US president can only impose tariffs of up to 25% unilaterally and that anything higher requires congressional approval.

Could be that when it's considered 'retaliation' that changes the rules.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 4 points 18 hours ago

Laws are only as effective as their enforcement, which means the US president can currently do pretty much whatever the fuck he wants to.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Champagne is a status symbol, people in clubs that need to show off are already paying $2000 for a bottle worth $50

[–] PostProcess@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely, and they'll likely pay 2000 for a bottle that costs 100. Realistically even more....

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, especially with such things, it will probably just become even more desirable by those stupid fucks paying that much for sparkling wine

So, this could actually be a win for Champagne, just like Cuban cigars got the image of being rare, good and expensive

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

DO IT! MORE CHAMPAGNE AND SPIRITS FOR US!

He doesnt apprecheate taste either way. Wouldnt even recognise it if it would shoot him

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Next month: 1000% tariffs, and blame Europe for the high prices. Wouldn't surprise me if he wants to go too war with Europe.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At this point It would be funny if the other parties forced him to have absurdly high tariffs like ten-quadrillion percent on everything. Just do it

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

No everybody loves the most bigly numbers everyone has ever seen. Make it one thousand octrillion per cent more than russia. Actually lower the tariffs on everything russian by the same amount.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Line must go up!

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] imvii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Next, Trump signs an executive decree that says they can now make champagne in the US because the US had been treated very unfairly by France by not allowing champagne to be made elsewhere and now that the USA can do it, everyone is going to become very rich.

...or something.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean technically anyone can call it champagne. I believe the only law is in France itself or possibly the EU. But I’d be curious how enforceable it is outside of gentlemen’s agreements.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

France has a worldwide trademark on the name Champagne since 1891, and it is one of the many named protected EU wide by the "protected designation of origin" registry.
But you can find "legal" US Champagne, because "California Champagne" was a separate trademark - any US manufacturer that made it before 2005 can continue using it.

Though it would be kinda hilarious if the Trump decided to start disrespecting global trademarks like that, as that's something that works both ways. Care for some French or Canadian made Tennessee Whisky, anyone?

[–] GrosPapatouf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Tennessee whisky is not a marketing argument in Europe, you're safe there.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Easy: build a network city owned by corporations. Call it champaigne. No one will notice (in the us)