this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
61 points (98.4% liked)

Astronomy

4480 readers
153 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zzyzx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Jupiter excitedly pointing out this news to Juno

[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 12 points 10 hours ago

*"Newly identified moons" I'm pretty sure they've been there for a while.

Having 128 new moons would really be noteworthy!

[–] grillgamesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 11 hours ago

Perhaps when they become fully operational battle stations?

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This is a great question. It's like asking when a rock is too small to be a planet. I suspect there were be a definition eventually that mirrors the planetary definition -- something like "spherical(ish) and clears its orbit". The issue is that Mars would lose its two moons under that definition.

So we might end up with something like "moons" vs "natural satellites" and Mars will just have to suck it up.

[–] kinttach@lemm.ee 6 points 10 hours ago

Moons vs. dwarf moons? (Sounds like a fantasy novel series.)