Link to archived tweet
Not just the great depression but the greatest depression ever in history, I mean the biggest, noone ever caused a bigger depression
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
927 points (99.6% liked)
People Twitter
6303 readers
1722 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You need to extend the graph beyond January. The US has been riding an enormous localized wave that crested shortly after Trump's inauguration. American securities (particularly the MAG7) are enormously overvalued, with revenue that is dwarfed by their stock price.
This is a much-needed market correction, not a regional stock performance split from within the US.
Not even suggesting Trump isn't shit. Its very obvious that he's popped the irrational optimism bubble we've been gliding on since even before COVID hit. But we were in a bubble. DOW 43k, never even mind the absurd NASDAQ run up, is not representative of the functional economic capacity of the nation as a whole. Without unlimited free money from the Fed to keep inflating asset prices, we were going to enter a downturn sooner or later.
The real question is whether the DOGE Team will kick the knees out from under our Treasury/Fed countercyclical spending system on the way back to earth and cause us to land harder than necessary.
Absolutely wild to look at this graph and say 'welp that's the correction we've expected and needed for a long time' when it is quite clear it's a reaction to Trump's totally unnecessary trade war and the uncertainty he is (intentionally?) injecting into markets. There is no reason to expect that if there had been a different President elected, this outcome would have occurred.
The even broader point is that there are a lot of people invested (literally and emotionally) in a continuing bull run. That doesn't mean it's a good idea, but suggesting that Trump or even less likely, DOGE have some master understanding of the economy and are doing this for its long-term health is an absolute fantasy.
Okay, here's my conspiracy theory....
Now let's say you're Trump and the supreme Court has said it's just about impossible to convict somebody of corruption in the US. You see that you're going to be elected president and your goal is to figure out how to make a crap ton of money off being present. Now you can do the boring old s make dignitaries stay at your hotel thing or have foreign governments. Give Jared kushner a bunch of money.... But that's all pocket change. If you're president, you can crash the economy. If you know a bunch of Rich Russian oligarchs who can short the market and you can tell them exactly when the market will crash then they can make billions... And you can get your cut too.
This is why Trump doesn't really give a shit why the tariffs are in place. That's why he makes up bullshit answers when asked why the tariffs are implemented. He doesn't care. ... But he really really really wants to yank the market around. First he says tariffs happening, then he says they're not, then they're happening again. Every time the market goes up and down he can make a shit ton of money if he can accurately predict when it goes up or down.
I can't get this idea out of my head. It makes more sense than anything else I can come up with. There's so much money to be made if you have the power to yank around the u.s. economy and enough narcissism to not give a shit about the people hurt in the process.
What I’m wondering when reading such theories is: does money matter all that much to these people? Like when you’re 80+ years old and a billionaire I don’t see what the end game there is, unless it’s just an uncle Scrooge attitude but I still find it a bit hard to believe. I think that in order to become a billionaire you need to be seriously driven by something more than 0s - maybe power, influence or attention.
You've got to step back a little to understand.
The key thing is that it is not possible (excluding inheritance) to become a billionaire without being a scheming psychopathic cut-throat selfish person and having a determined drive to have power over others.
The second key is it's not possible to keep your billions without being a psychopath. This because you could never possibly spend that money in your lifetime and the only way to have accumulated it is through exploitation of labour.
So it's a thing you don't need that you got via abusing others. They want power and they don't care how they get it. They have no plan beyond that. Personally I think it's mental health issues and the fact that we allow this in our flawed system.
it's not just allowed it's encouraged, in fact i'd go as far as to say it's the only way to "win" in this system
It's not wealth hoarding, it's wealth OBSTRUCTION as a means to control everyone. It's pathological fo sho.
They're just tryna nut. It's the only way they still can
Logically you would think the answer should be that money shouldn't matter much, but it always seems to. It's still a way of keeping score and a proxy for power. They've always longed for more money/power and as they get older and their brain slows down, they don't suddenly change. What old billionaire have you seen says "you know what? I'm going to give everyone raises! I don't need more money! We should all be happy together!" (Almost) never happens. They want more and more and more... and then they die.
Bill Gates seems to be like that. Don't get me wrong, I don't like him and he's still doing lots of shitty billionaire stuff, but he seems to be satisfied with "just" being a billionaire and making sure his offspring ~~will be billionaires~~won't starve as well and giving away a lot of the money he will never be able to spend on his own anyway. Same goes for George Soros and Warren Buffet.
That was my idea. These jarring and quickly implemented money drainers only really help ppl outside the market.
This is what happens when your president is a used car salesman.
Everyone with ETFs targeting US stocks sweating right now
This is going to be a hard one to explain to the MAGA fans
What isn't hard to explain to that lead poisoned cult of cunts.
It's ukraine's fault. Should've thanked harder
why would Joe Biden do this
The stock market was bloated
Actual trump regime statements
Despite all the myths Democrats are better for the economy. They always produce better numbers.
rich ppl yacht money "economy", sure
Uh no? Compare employment numbers from whichever source you prefer. Democratic presidents have lower unemployment.
That's not true. They definitely should do way more to help the working class but the numbers show that the economy in general is better under them.
You're essentially agreeing to the person you're responding to...
I think the average people do benefit as well not just the wealthy even though they do benefit more.
Nonsense. Disappointed this gets upvotes.
How the hell are the democrats the party of enriching the wealthy when compared to the fucking R's?? I mean fucking hell have any of you ever read a book or even glanced at historic and current R policy?
I'm disappointed in you too friend, but how is that effin pertinent?
Discussion and disagreement are what boards are for, not clown ass comments like "muh disappointment" lolol lemmy get a load of this guy
How the hell are the democrats the party of enriching the wealthy when compared to the fucking R’s??
glances at the Obama administration unprecedented market bull run while foreclosures were rampant and low-income poverty surged
The Americans, in typical capitalist extravagance, insist on having two right-wing parties instead of one.
I mean fucking hell have any of you ever read a book or even glanced at historic and current R policy?
Democrats sow, Republicans reap. But the line only ever consistently goes up for the already wealthy. Passive income dominates wage growth. Assets prices outrun revenues thanks to our investor-friendly monetary policies. And the Piketty R > G math, with (r)ate of investment return > (g)ross domestic profit yield, leads to a steady consolidation of property in the hands of a shrinking ultra-wealthy minority under both parties.
Yes, democrats do periodically have to save capitalism from itself - for which the bourgeois are perpetually aggrieved. But what did Obama do when he was handed half the financial sector on a platter by the outgoing Bush Administration? Did he properly title homeowners who had already paid in mortgage several multiples of the face value of their homes? Did he cancel a bunch of outstanding student loan debt, so that college students weren't perpetually hobbled by interest payments on debt? Did he universalize Medicaid or even deliver on a public option to evade insurance company graft?
No. He gave the bankers their crooked banks back for a vanishingly tiny ROI. He forgave the debts of major lenders, bailed out executives, propped up stock prices of major hedge funds and corporate institutions, subsidized private insurance to the benefit of the insurers, downsized Medicaid during the Government Shutdown fight, increased school privatization at the primary level, and did literally nothing for his most zealous base of supporters - educated professionals.
And then his party got absolutely washed in the subsequent three election cycles, culminating in the nation's most incestuous pedophile taking the White House in 2016.
And that was Obama, the closest thing to a progressive the party has produced since LBJ. Carter, Clinton, and Biden were even worse.
Realistically the right makes things worse for the 90%, the centre makes things worse for the 90% but slower. At least in recent history.
I don't think its "compared" to the Rs but just in general they are good for "rich ppl yacht" money. Your instant move to compare the two parties (making bad policy OK by comparing it to "OH FUCK" policy) is why the usa is in the state it is now.
Interesting. I didn't know I had a say in US politics being 5000 miles away and not a citizen. I'll be sure to smarten my ideas up. Send marine force 2 or whatever to pick me up and I'll sort that shit show out for you once I kick trump in the balls/face.
Also there's literally only one other option so yea of course it's compared to the opposition. That's how the system is setup.
AND youre not a citizen of the US? Sit your fool ass down playa 🤣
Bitch please. Who'd want to be a US citizen now? The others are locked in there with tools like you.
Meanwhile in free roaming European: were laughing at you morons for electing a king.
Are you sure you are replying to the correct comment? I am not american and yes I too have no say in their system, but "less bad" is still bad.
Not sure why you think commenting on geopolitics and other nations economic policy means you need to fall to the same BS they have. Even less that making comments somehow gives us a say.
I like the little hopeful bump before the inauguration.
That's not a bump. It's in line with the rest of the world.
Yes, a bump in the world markets. On US news. A trend I hope we see less of in the future.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Damnit, I came here to blame Joe Biden, but it seems like everyone else beat me to it. Oh well, time to go tariff some more countries and then act shocked by the results....
How dare Biden tank the economy while trump is president just to make him look bad! Any day now, all these incomprehensible tariff ramblings, threats, and further ostracization of our allies are going to make America so great! /s
load more comments
(1 replies)
view more: next ›