this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2023
152 points (98.1% liked)

Space

8728 readers
13 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Rhaedas@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not the only one, but Voyager is a great example of how NASA can take a minimally funded idea, have things break enroute, and still manage to get magnitudes more out of the project than originally planned. Voyager has been used for science that wasn't even conceived of when it was launched.

Makes you wonder what we could do if we put as much money into science as we do other things.

Yeah absolutely, imagine when military budget and NASA budget were swapped. I bet we were already colonizing Mars and probably other planets as well.

[โ€“] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fantastic!! Voyager is one of my favorite things that humanity has done. But I'm sad to learn from the article that it's expected to run out of power sometime after 2025.

[โ€“] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thats great news. I'm glad that nasa was able to "yell" at it loud enough, for it to re-aim at earth.

[โ€“] niktemadur@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"HEY! OVER HERE! YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT, HERE!!!"

[โ€“] tallwookie@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

really surprising that it's still functioning at all - they sure dont make things like they used to...

[โ€“] clausetrophobic@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well actually they make things about as good or better than they used to. Remember that mars helicopter that was only supposed to last a few flights?

[โ€“] tallwookie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

yeah, that's fair

[โ€“] cynar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If anything, they are building them better. Their rovers now vastly exceed their original missions. Satellites now form an interplanetary internet network. We even have a helicopter on Mars! It's reached the point where it's playing spotter for the river, since they've run out of experiments to run on it!

There was 1 (experimental) mission into using ion drives. Multiple drives failed. 1 only lost its +ve ion thruster, another only it's -ve thruster. They managed to reconfigure it in flight. The 2 drives were interconnected via an FPGA processor on board. They rerouted the engines through the computer!

Don't get me wrong, Voyager I and II are amazing. However, given the same opportunity and funding now, the result would blow them away in almost every department, including longevity.