this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
90 points (85.2% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

938 readers
243 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

PTB, this seems really like they're overstepping their bounds, @Demigodrick@lemmy.zip has clarified the matter.

Unfortunately this isn't the first time Lemmy.world has done something like this using "legal" as an excuse, and probably won't be the last time. They're too big so they'll never get defederated or penalized by any server wishing to stay even remotely relevant so nothing is likely to change.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

Damn, i liked sag :(

I think i'm going with a soft PTB from my pov. Tbf dbzer0 is pretty lax on rules, especially towards people outside the instance. I don't think it's within my place or anyone else's to ban someone from such a huge part of the fediverse.

But this highlights the need to decentralize from .world, the fact that a single instance ban can take away such a huge part of the fediverse from a user feels ridiculous.

I get why they did it, but it feels unfair.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Bruh

Why we banning kids now?

What if they have shitty parents and need to go online to vent?

😓

[–] Blazingtransfem98@discuss.online 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)

What if they have shitty parents and need to go online to vent?

That's the whole point, they want to keep children away from support networks to enforce the idea of parents owning their children. People are going to argue otherwise but as a trans person myself I've seen this and you're not fooling anyone with your lame excuses about protecting kids. People especially those who are vulnerable need support networks, do you know how many trans kids kill themselves because they can't get the support they need and live with abusive and controlling parents. Don't tell me it's to protect kids, I'm not stupid enough to buy that lie and you're not stupid enough to think I'd buy it.

[–] scholar@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is the fediverse, they can sign up to any instance that will have them.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I think an 18+ rule for an instance that allows porn or federates with porn instances is reasonable. And when you interact with another instance's communities, you are beholden to their rules. And the admin who did it said they're talking about changing the rule. So it's not like they're just trying to be dicks.

So... I'm going to go with admins did what they had to, sag learned a tiny lesson about not giving people more information than they needed. I don't want to say YDI, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

ptb

but....

I think it's great that we can expect actual rules and enforcement from instance admins, and have a chance to suss out the edges of these rules in open fora.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Aw, they actually did the ban. That's unfortunate.

On one hand, yes, legal liability and all that, but on the other hand half the site is copyright violations. The law only matters sometimes. I say this as someone who has hosted web communities myself, there's no reason to be banning for something like age on these instances, especially when we're talking 16 and not 12. It's unenforceable and trivial enough that there's no legal pressure to do so.

[–] CarbonBasedNPU@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

I just think they should make a new account and not say that they are underage. I don't so much have a problem with people being underage online but saying that you are is putting an unnecessary target on your back.

[–] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Hey, I’m the one that decided to ban this user. I understand the frustration, but it is very much in the TOS of lemmy.world and has been for a long time.

We are having an internal discussion to see if there’s room to lower the age to 16 and if we can make exceptions for federated users.

I hope you see that this really isn’t meant as a powertrip, and we are just trying to protect the Lemmy.world site.

Sorry if I do not respond to comments quickly, it’s late in my timezone.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Hello,

Thank you for chiming in. Exceptions for federated users would be nice, especially for someone turning 18 in a few months.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] flamingos@feddit.uk 22 points 2 days ago (45 children)

I'm really not sure how the TOS apply given it opens with:

This Terms of Service applies to your access to and active use of https://lemmy.world/, it's API's and sub-domain services (ex alt GUIs)(we, us, our the website, Lemmy.World, or LW) as well as all other properties and services associated with Lemmy.World.

Sag wasn't accessing or making active use of lemmy.world itself. This would be like an email provider blocking a particular address from another service because the user of that address doesn't comply with a part of their TOS.

load more comments (45 replies)
[–] sag@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

I think it only appears on .worlds modlog

[–] sag@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

@EllaSpiggins@lemm.ee

Hey, I want your opinion on this matter. As you are currently admin of lemm.ee. Is my ban reasonable or just stupid? Whatever you will say I wil go with it.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sag@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Most of the user on .world if they can't even see my post what is point of posting :(

[–] yawn@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago

You can always just make a fresh account (and don't tell anybody)

[–] throwaway@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago

There is still lots of people on other instances - and this could push people off .world.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

The other person suggested an alt without telling anyone, Ssems like the best outcome, really. That way LW can keep a blind eye to the thing, and your posts on your alts wouldn't be banned from LW

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sag@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Or @sunaurus@lemm.ee

If you don't mind. I know you are currently busy because of new wave of user. Sorry and Thanks

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›