this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
507 points (97.6% liked)

Comic Strips

14882 readers
3015 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.threepanelsoul.com/comic/talent

It's an oldie from 2015, but I still think about it whenever people talk about being talented at something.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago* (last edited 23 minutes ago)

If they weren't talented then they never would have been able to start.

That's luck based.

ITT: Neurotypicals assuming anyone can do anything with time.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 2 hours ago

Talent alone won't cut it. There is the passion and the work. The news had a recent thing about a love letter michael jordan had where he told his love that the only thing he would love more is basketball. But he did not get to where he got with just passion and hard work. He had talent to. Im in tech. I love technology and have a knack but I also got a bachelors and masters degree along with certifications. Pretty much everything is like this.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 33 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

“You’re lucky you had parents who could afford: a piano, an apartment big enough for a piano, time for you to practice besides your studies, and maybe even a music teacher”

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Excuses. You can start practicing on a cheap keyboard or digital stage piano you can find at a thrift store that you can play on your bed. You don’t need to have a stand up piano to learn to play. With internet nowadays it’s very easy to learn the basics like learning scales and reading sheet music. And you can practice between studies. You don’t need to practice hours a day to learn some basic songs. Like 10 minutes a day can take you very far.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

It's obvious from the comic that it doesn't talk about the way you mention doing it.

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Much better

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 79 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 29 points 17 hours ago

Ah, one of the rare SFW Oglaf comics.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 12 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

How do they get food in there, and other science facts?

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

It's just a comic, you really should just relax

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] melpomenesclevage@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

literally 'a wizard did it'.

[–] Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

From the guy who wanted to be a 5-star Michelin chef (material gets provided). Just pray he already is there for a while.

[–] nylo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

maybe woosh @me but Michelin stars only go up to 3

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 4 hours ago

well, he's gonna be there a while then.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

He wants to be the first to get 5

[–] cholesterol@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Bathroom...

[–] limelight79@lemm.ee 54 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Related: "Your camera takes good pictures!"

[–] Zoidsberg@lemmy.ca 4 points 13 hours ago

You made my eye twitch.

[–] Schal330@lemmy.world 48 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

There is merit in practice, but natural talent is very real. One person could spend years practicing something that someone else picks up and surpasses that person in a year.

[–] Droechai@lemm.ee 43 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

Im a low low ELO player but enjoy chess. I teached a kid how to play on a summer event, and the kid, probably around 10 years old, never did the same error twice and easily beat me on the third day (around 5 games a day vs me and who knows how many against the other event leaders)

Really humbling, but I think I helped kindle a new hobby for the kid

[–] expr@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Kids are just really good at learning quickly. That's all it is, really. Chess is all about study and learning, so kids are very adept at getting good quickly. Obviously there are some who are prodigies, but that's pretty exceptionally rare.

Adult learners also can get good quickly, but it requires a lot of meta-cognitive thinking (thinking about how you think, or "learning to learn"), time, and discipline. The guy that runs my local chess club is probably in his 60s, and he told me that he was sitting around ~1100 for a long time until recently he started studying, where he rapidly jumped up to ~1600 after, as he put it, "things clicked".

It's never too late to rapidly improve your own abilities, which is what I really love about the game, because I find it teaches you to apply that mindset to all aspects of life.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Nothing wrong with playing Electric Light Orchestra.

What’s your favorite song to play?

[–] PeteWheeler@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

You did good. Fostering and developing the younger generation.

I compete in video games (smash bros ult) and there is a lot of humbling experiences when you are unable to beat a child that is 10 years younger than you every week for 2 straight years.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

No doubt, but imo "natural talent" is way less common than just people who have put in the work, at least for musicians in my experience. For every person i know that just started rippin shit from when they were 3 years old there's like 20 more folks who have just put in the hours. I also think some people who seem to have that natural talent it's more like they just were immersed in that environment from birth. Music is a lot like a language; you can always learn a new language as an adult but people that grow up speaking it because of their environment will make it look effortless.

[–] Fritee@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In addition, a lot of the “natural talent” might be coming from early childhood practice when children's brains are the most malleable - eg if a kid is drawing since they are 6, it is much more likely they'll be noticed and cultivated. Which makes them more likely to appear talented when they are 11 / 15 etc, when they might be noticed and cultivated in turn etc. Early advantages pile up.

Not to say that some things gene related are not advantageous - you are not likely to become a basketball player if you are short, even if you put in enormous amounts of practice.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Yep exactly what I was trying to get at

[–] PeteWheeler@lemmy.world 16 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Talent is hard to define. In my opinion talent = unobserved practice/study.

This picture gets the concept across pretty well. But it can also happen with kids that "happen" to be good at something. Like sports. Was that kid a natural at baseball, or did he just watch a lot of baseball games and played backyard baseball a shit ton so he just knew the rules/strats before any of the other kids?

Some people learn faster than others yes, but learning in itself is a skill.

Maybe this isn't true, but it is definitely 100% more effective than assuming talent is outside of your control or an obstacle that can not be cleared.

[–] bpev@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Reminds me, Malcom Gladwell's "Outliers" book had a section about his interesting observation that pro hockey players' birthdays are skewed to the earlier months of the year. He attributed that to a kind of butterfly effect:

  1. youth hockey leagues set league cutoffs by age
  2. the early month kids are slightly older, bigger, and stronger
  3. because they are better at the very beginning, they get more playing time, more encouragement, maybe visit more "all-star" kind of things, where they might get extra coaching
  4. eventually those kids actually just become better, because they had a better environment to grow.

I mean idk how accurate this exact instance is, but I feel it's a good thought experiment in thinking of how seemingly insignificant parts of the environment (like when in the year all the youth hockey leagues start) can impact whatever talent is. The whole nature vs nurture thing.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 10 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

To be fair, to be able to practice regularly for so long to gain skill is rather lucky. Also, not all practice is equal, so having someone teach you to practice more effectively is a privilege. Either that or practicing on your own in an unguided manner and still being able to gain skill takes talent.

Yeah, that's lucky and very well could require being lucky enough to have some sort of talent along the path.

[–] udon@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

This. It's easier to practice/study if you don't share a room with 3 siblings and don't need to spend your off time supporting the family in various ways.

Also, don't get mad at that person trying to give you a compliment

[–] hark@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

"Talent" could also be an affinity for practicing that skill. I don't think I'm exceptional at programming, but I got good at it because I enjoyed it and that was enough to drive me to develop that skill. There are other skills I didn't develop as much because I didn't feel as driven to pursue them.

I hate that having to work so damn hard on something is the only way to success. I don't have time to train for everything I want to be good at.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 3 points 19 hours ago

In my region, people use "talented" as a compliment, not necessarily to indicate their skill was not hard-won.

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Ah, Mac Hall. Those were the days.