this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
597 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

13145 readers
1680 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daw@feddit.org 10 points 11 hours ago

annas-archive.org

You might have to switch your DNS to one that doesn't block based on copyright

(e.g. Cloudflare: 1.1.1.1)

Actually i think the effort they are making is cool. It goes well beyond piracy and I think is a good idea esp in face of the world rn.

Elsevier is organized crime.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I refuse to pay to view papers. Knowledge should be free to anyone who wants it.

[–] Animated_beans@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If research is funded by tax dollars, then it should absolutely be free for everyone to have access to.

I'm not sure how I feel about private research being required to be free to all (does it disencentivize research to let everyone learn from what you paid to learn?). Either way, if the tax payer pays for something, they deserve free access to learn from it.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 1 day ago

private research can go ahead and charge to be viewed, and enjoy no one else giving a flying fuck about their presumably heavily biased research.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 20 hours ago

All corporations benefit from public services.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

Fuck copyrights.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

PLEASE CONSIDER TO DONATE TO A SCI-HUB INSTANCE OF YOUR PREFERENCE

1000058335

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

Also, donate your time to review papers, an absolutely critical part of "peer reviewed journals", for the people charging you both.

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Qeios is pretty cool.

(Open access non-profit journal that charges less than 30 USD to publish)

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Every journal chages > 30 USD smh

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m dumb. < 30 USD was what I meant

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

>_>^ ^<_<

>_<

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago

We don't pay for shit. Universities and taxpayers do.
It will be interesting to see what cutting university funding does to publishers who may realize that half their "customers" can't afford their services and have to turn to (quote/unquote) piracy. On the one hand I'm optimistic of a price adjustment. On the otherhand, a nagging suspicion that nothing good can come from the sudden lack of access to research creeps upon me.