this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
205 points (98.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

7151 readers
760 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago

Do swing-wing planes count as fixed wing planes? Please answer, this is a time-sensitive question and NATO won't answer my calls

[–] BaroqueInMind@lemmy.one 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

A bullet is technically not flying, it's falling while traveling really fast, otherwise you wouldn't need to compensate for drop over distance. Warhammer 40k bolters fly because they are essentially self guided rockets

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

falling while traveling really fas

This is the best normal translation of "a ballistic trajectory" i've ever seen.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

Reminds me of the Hitchhiker's Guide sequels with their method of flying as "throwing yourself at the ground and missing" which is essentially describing an orbit.

A bullet is technically not flying, it's falling ~~while traveling really fast~~ with style...

FTFY

[–] sundrei@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 days ago

Pity the Gyrojet never took off. (Er, so to speak!)

[–] NoxAstrum@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I was just about to say that.

Where Ekranoplan?

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

YB-40 and MQ-9 aren't fixed-wing??

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

This is utter bullshit.

Everyone knows that 45acp is superior to 5.56 for this use

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ya know, if a 5.56 bullet is an air superiority fighter, so is a rock flung by a trebuchet. I don't make the rules, that Newton guy did.

[–] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trebuchets are for nerds, what with all that calculation and such.

Bullets go brrrrrrrrrr

Battleship Turret Crew:

[–] erin@social.sidh.bzh 3 points 2 days ago

@southsamurai @Sylvartas yes too complicated: we should go full "Indian China: The BONK war"

[–] 0laura@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

was the rock itself made by a human? maybe yes because it was turned into that shape by a human, or maybe no because it was made by the earth

[–] KinglyWeevil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

Lmao your username got me good

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Show me which Zeppelin engaged air targets.

[–] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Doctrine radical: an insect in flight is an air target.

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What about other balloons?

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Skua@kbin.earth 1 points 1 hour ago

While I don't know where to find any solid records of them ever actually shooting anything down - there are a few scattered comments about one plane being shot down during the Tondern raid, and others about Alan Arnett McLeod VC getting shot down by one in 1917, but I can't substantiate either - they did have guns on them. To take the Zeppelin P Class as an example, those had eight MG 08 machine guns on them

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Clearly a gentleman's way of air combat.