this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
237 points (93.4% liked)

Europe

4273 readers
217 users here now

Europa

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Well put Mr. Tusk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] index@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 hours ago

Nobody is begging. Politicians are using "defence" as a leverage to enpower and enrich themself

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

And Germany is taking on 1 trillion Euros in new debt to protect against Russia, which is currently spending less on its military than the EU, while fighting a war.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 6 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

citation needed.

I've seen the €800b figure but that's the EU as a whole, not Germany on its own

[–] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Germany is currently planning a "whatever it takes" spending plan of 500 billion for infrastructure projects and an equally high, but potentially unlimited amount for defense.
https://www.ft.com/content/ee20978f-bbcd-4616-954c-7749dc5334fd

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 3 points 9 hours ago

So ok, that’s not one trillion.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago

Over 10 years

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)
[–] seeigel@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

He knew that before Trump's election but didn't make it an issue. He also knows that it implies that Russia will never attack Poland, let alone Poland allied with Europe.

What's the real need for the strengthened military?

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

What’s the real need for the strengthened military?

same as it ever was

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml -1 points 9 hours ago

Doesn't Russia want to see Nato entirely gone?

[–] Lemmist@lemm.ee 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

50 mil was in '91. Less than 40 at the beginning of war. No idea how many now. 20?

[–] Suoko@feddit.it 9 points 21 hours ago

37 before war.

6 displaced abroad (unhcr)

7 displaced internally.

So around 30 left officially

[–] guy@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

TIL Russia's war in Ukraine is as bloody as WW2

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

Not from deaths so much as emigrations and secessions.

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not necessarily. A lot of people (6.9 million according to unrefugees.org) fled the country. That number may be on the low end, as men capable of joining the military fleeing the country may be considered traitors and might therefore flee in secret.

Ukrainian deaths directly caused by the war is counted in the tens of thousands. Casualties are in the hundred thousands, but "casualty" can mean anything from a broken toe to death.

Things are beaker on the Russian side, easily having twice or more the deaths and casualties of the Ukrainians.

The numbers are vague, though. Both sides have good reasons to keep the true numbers a secret, and we won't hear the true Ukrainian numbers until years after the war (and we'll probably never find out true numbers from the Russian side). However, it's not like tens off millions of people are dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›