this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
254 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41804 readers
3706 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

U.S.-China tensions are escalating as Trump imposes tariffs on all Chinese goods, prompting Beijing to retaliate and vow to fight “any type” of war.

China is boosting defense spending by 7.2% while portraying itself as a stable global partner.

The fentanyl issue adds to disputes, with Beijing dismissing it as a pretext for tariffs.

China faces economic struggles but is injecting billions to stabilize growth.

If Trump continues escalating tariffs, the trade war could intensify, worsening global economic and geopolitical instability.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 28 minutes ago

China faces economic struggles but is injecting billions to stabilize growth.

The sole manufacturer of everything we buy faces economic struggles. We better fucking hope they don’t because all they have to do is increase prices and we’ll bring them the money on our knees. Good planning on behalf of our capitalist oberlords.

[–] middlemanSI@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

winnie the pooh vs. a dumb sack of fat. 3, 2, 1, go!

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 hour ago

Bring the tofu drag and sewage oil to the US!

[–] soyboy77@fedia.io 13 points 8 hours ago

These world leaders desperately want to be seen as tough guys but they're merely overcompensating for their micropenises.

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 100 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I just caught myself almost rooting for China for a moment there. It has been a wild month.

[–] stopdropandprole@lemmy.world 26 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

the Cold War was a free printing money machine for 50 years. creating a new one against China makes sense if you're an oligarch whose wealth rides upon govt contracts and endless military industrial expansionism.

and it kinda explains why Putin is manipulating Trump to make him believe they'll choose the US over China in a game of saber rattling. Russia is positioning itself to be the tie-breaker so it can play both sides against one another in lucrative energy/arms deals. maybe they'll even get some real estate out of it.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

They are welcome to Florida if they leave the rest of us alone

~/s~

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 40 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Trust me, they aren’t. But neither are the Americans.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 2 hours ago

Xi is definitely beating Trump at thumb war.

[–] aleq@lemmy.world 29 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

"If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we're ready to fight till the end," China's embassy said on X, reposting a line from a government statement on Tuesday.

Maybe something is lost in translation, but this sounds like they're primarily talking about economic wars. My reading is that they're just saying that they won't accept US bullying, which is good.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 30 points 13 hours ago

The "any other type of war" part is definitely intentional though.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

China is just as jingoistic as America for domestic consumption. Both countries believe their own propaganda. It's like pre-WW1 Russian Empire and Austria-Hungry all over again. Complete ignorance that any actual conflict would rip them to pieces.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

OG red and green version only

[–] scottrepreneur@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Is green the version you got when combining blue and yellow?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 14 hours ago

Air superiority conflict over the Caribbean!

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I choose Naval Battle! Go!

lol yeah their navy has “army” in its name. Their blue-water capability is simply not in the same league as the USN.

But also, if they wait a few years, I’m sure our military will start to fracture and esprit de corps and morale will largely evaporate because they’re all sick of shooting at other Americans.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 10 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I was hoping for a pog war. I hear the pog of war makes things very tricky.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 11 hours ago

The only time when having SLAM in the headline; describing a pog war is acceptable.

[–] badhops@sh.itjust.works 3 points 14 hours ago