this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
1244 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
5096 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ALilOff@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We all know what’s going to happen, Elon just going to get a “government contract”, where he can make it so that teslas will be the main vehicle manufacturer for government.

[–] DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fuck. What if Elon is just gonna start making weapons? Didn't he flaunt a flamethrower for his lame company years ago?

Boring*

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (12 children)

its not the death of the electric car. Its the death of a bad one.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 5 points 5 days ago

All cars are bad. Combustion or not.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

One of the things that has continuously confounded me about Musk's veneration by the modern American fascist is that one of the main accomplishments they hail him as a genius for are "his" advancements in electric cars.

Which are necessitated by Global Warming.

Which they do not believe in.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I would like a Chinese EV, but the capitalists are enforcing protectionism.

[–] jaschen@lemm.ee 11 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I would too, but you have to understand why the USA is blocking these cars from coming in. The cost of these cheap EVs are not based off of supply and demand. Its not even this cheap because of effectiveness or efficiencies. Its from the CCP subsidies. The CCP wants to dump on the competition in efforts to kill off anyone making a car, then start jacking up the price after they have market share.

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

My dude the US subsidizes the shit out of its electric car industry. When someone brings up "supply and demand" and just tries to pretend that the economy is exactly what they learned in their econ101 class.

They are doing the tarrifs on Chinese EVS because (1) they can't compete on price and (2) the Chinese EVS are just a superior product.

You're right on China though. They are just doing exactly what the US has done for decades. It's just that the US doesn't like having to actually compete with another country. So instead of actually making better and cheaper cars they instead just decide to tell the American people "nah, looks like you're just being a shit Tesla"

The US loves to say "free market" but notice how they don't allow a free market to force their industry to actually innovate and compete.

China is not "cheating" by subsidizing it's industry. That's literally just standard shit every government does. Thats just an excuse. America is subsidizing it's EVs too. They just have worse EVs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] conicalscientist@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm also pretty sure their security / safety standards are pure ass. I barely trust our automakers, I sure as shit don't trust the fucking CCP

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] computerscientistII@lemm.ee 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What?

Revenue [increased] 2% to $25.71 billion

Yes. Only 25.7 billion dollars. It's practically dead.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 27 points 6 days ago

Q4 2024 was before all the overt nazi shit.

But I agree that calling it dead is premature.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 31 points 6 days ago (20 children)

nobody wants a defective car.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 15 points 6 days ago

They've probably had more recalls on the cyber truck than they've had sales of the cyber truck

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›