this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
282 points (97.6% liked)

politics

20531 readers
4287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

JD Vance is actively working to raise his profile in the Trump administration after being overshadowed by Elon Musk.

During a recent Oval Office meeting, Vance took the lead to criticize Zelensky as “disrespectful,” setting up Trump to criticize Zelensky.

According to New York Times reporter Michael Shear, this confrontational approach is part of Vance's strategy to avoid being "relegated to the B-team" in what has become "one of the most fast-paced and aggressive administrations in modern history."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

This tool should be happy he is a vice president, holy fuck. He is already a contender for least qualified VP in history. I would keep my head down and aim for a defence consultation contract or lobbyist position in four years.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Hell he's not even qualified for the C team

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

C is for Couch tho. Pretty sure he's more than qualified.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

He's already on the C-team, Trump himself is on the B team and Musk is the A team apparently

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sopuli.xyz 9 points 17 hours ago

Desperation isn’t a strategy, J.D.—it’s just embarrassing.

🐱🐱

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 3 points 14 hours ago

Good luck with that couch fucker.

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 96 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Sorry to break it to you, guyliner, but under Trump you'll always be the b-team, at max. He'll throw you under the bus in a second if it serves his agenda.

And in this case you're struggling to reach even that segment as you're clearly outranked by a terminally online immigrant numpty who just want friends.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

He's still one heart attack away from the big chair .

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Firstly, "guyliner"?!:) I love it!!! Guyliner Couchthrob (it's immature but it contains no less truth than most of the things that come out of his mouth...).

On the actual context, and as some of the other comments line it out, there appear to be 3 subtle concurrent fault lines here:

  1. Trump who is only for himself (and putin).
  2. Musk
  3. The tech broligarchy whose goal is long-term power consolidation through propping up Guyliner Couchthrob as the successor

I think it's clear that trump will throw musk under the bus when he'll need a sudden boost in popularity. His plans with Guyliner are much less clear, I'm sure he's considering to keep him for medvedev/putin type of setup (from back when russia had term limits, LOL).

[–] neidu3@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I heard "guyliner" on a podcast. Don't remember which, so I won't take credit for that one. WTYP, probably.

Also, I'm not against guys wearing eyeliner in a reasonable manner (which Vance objectively does), it was just that it is the only visual and noteworthy trait about him.

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Yeah it's a decades-old term at this point.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

There's nothing wrong with his ottoman erotic fixation either.:)

Jokes aside, I think guyliner is fair game to mock someone trying to be the arbiter of "traditional masculinity".

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Guyliner Couchthrob

Sounds like Guybrush Threepwood's racist couchfucker cousin.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

B team means no more couches to fuck, ottomans and small armchairs only.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

He's just looking for a lusty Chesterfield

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Has to settle for a dusty Poang.

[–] Tezzerets_Tea_Time@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

I wish Vance's mom put him on the Plan B team instead of inflicting this lifelong b team loser on the world.

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 26 points 1 day ago

Glad we blew up our relationship with Europe so this guy can make his career.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I am hopeful that this means a bit more. Vance was catapulted into politics with money from Peter Thiel. If he is at risk of being relegated to the B-team maybe that means that Thiel and Trump are on the outs. Maybe Trump thinks he doesn't need Thiel's money anymore now that he has Musk's money.

The best hope for Democracy in America right now is if our new Oligarchs get too distracted fighting each other that they do a bit less damage, and accidentally let an actual election through in 2026.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

This was my hope once the results came in. That they'd be too busy fighting each other for power to actually cause too much lasting damage

[–] errer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t kid yourself, Thiel and Musk founded PayPal together and despite prior friction they’ve always been on the same team. In fact Musk becoming a full blown fascist has been Musk’s “return to Jesus” moment as far as Thiel is concerned.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Note that Musk was not a PayPal founder, he helped found "X", a PayPal competitor that wasn't really doing that well, but managed to merge with PayPal after PayPal was winning the market.

Musk was also the one who about ran PayPal into the ground with incompetence and he was forced out of decision making to save the company.

Don't know if this changes anything relative to Thiel, but just wanted to highlight that Musk gets credited with PayPal but his history is first losing to them as a competitor and nearly ruining them as a leader, and finally getting a big sum off money for eBay for his failures...

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also, according to recent reports, people hate working with Musk. Each company has people who, if he ever shows up, part of their job is to keep him from interfering with people who are actually working. He's basically a toddler.

So, the point is that, if it was just their past of working together, you'd actually expect Musk and Thiel to be enemies.

I'm guessing that they do actually get along, though, for the exact same reason that modern day Nazis have to stick together.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Fun fact:

Thiel also called musk a socioopath.

The article:

https://www.businessinsider.com/peter-thiel-elon-musk-relationship-contrarian-book-max-chafkin-2021-9?op=1

And don't forget the rest of the paypal mafia who basically created modern society and its tech disopia :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal_Mafia

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

No, the best hope for democracy in America right now is for the populace to protest. Hard. You can't sit there and hope the problem away. You have to get up and make it happen. Fascism doesn't just go away. You have to cut it out of the system.

I know it's hard to come to terms with, but the sooner you realize the better it'll be. Everyone seems to be sitting there waiting for someone else to swoop down and save things, and that's exactly the kind of thinking that led you where you are. The founding fathers put the power with the people because they realized that's where the actual power was. You've all forgotten that and have become complacent.

Don't allow this to go on.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Thiel likes to work from the shadows, moreso than the first term, where he was personally interacting with trump, I'm guessing the anti-lgbqt+ sentiment is the reason why he's not so public anymore( indirectly which led to his boy toy models death)

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

He's in third place at best. B team would be a promotion.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bruh. You're the vice president. Your fucking job is to be the head of the b-team. Amazing how the fragile old man shit baby managed to find a fragile middle aged shit baby to be his running mate

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah most vice presidents don’t sit next to the president when he has Oval Office meetings with foreign leaders. He should be out kissing babies and visiting donut shops and shit.

Now we’ve got Trump, musk and Vance all trying to be the biggest dickheads in the room

[–] Revan343@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

most vice presidents don’t sit next to the president

For rather important security reasons

Now we’ve got Trump, musk and Vance all trying to be the biggest dickheads in the room

Once Boeing finishes the new Air Force One, they should all have their dickwaving contests on board, it'd be grand. I'm sure there's nothing wrong with the plane.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago

One can only hope.

[–] dexa_scantron@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sorry JV. With musk running the show, it's not too clear where you fit into the chain of command. But you're definitely not making varsity.

[–] aviationeast@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

He should have Musk arrested for treason, corruption, bribery, fraud, waste, and abuse.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago

B-team ha! JD is looking to finally graduate from waterboy.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How does one that’s on the C team get relegated to the B team. I think they used the wrong word.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago

Rubio is on the c team

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

Just what we need; morons with power trying to out-stupid each other.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

couchfucker looks up to rapist for validation

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 23 hours ago

Overshadowed by president musk

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

I suspect Vance was thrown under the bus since that couch thing became a meme.

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Maybe, but there are a lot of analysts who say this was planned beforehand. And Vance I think is waiting patiently for his moment, I don't think he's competing with Musk they are more likely in cahoots.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Vance is playing the odds that Trump's heart won't last four years?

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Even with the president seat in reach I would expect the GOP to somehow take it from JD if they get the chance.

JD: I'm the president now!
Them: Sure kid...

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Literally JV.

[–] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Cool. Let's abandon an entire nation to an agressor, costing additional lives, and blow up the biggest military alliance, just so Vance gets to look cool (he failed). Very cool.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You don't want too many cooks in the kitchen, as they say. These jokers aren't making soup though and there's no such idiom about crooks in the kitchen.

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

It’s commonly known in the insurance industry that when you have two many crooks in the kitchen, the establishment tends to go up in flames right before it is unable to pay the next insurance premium.

And then the crooks stupid enough to burn it down tend to go to prison.

[–] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I seem to remember one about too many hands in the cookie jar. Seems appropriate enough here.

[–] LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago

That's true, but the fed has a lot of jars to pilfer.