this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
31 points (84.4% liked)

Privacy

1301 readers
135 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote big-tech software.
  5. No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
  6. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  7. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)

Related communities:

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: https://privacytests.org/

cross-posted from: https://theprancingpony.in/objects/883cc655-8267-c309-1237-9eb599273886

Like many others, I’ve been looking into internet browsers lately. This guy has put together a pretty extensive comparison: pctips.com/best-browsers

#privacy #browsers #firefox #firefoxgate

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

BTW: "this guy" on PrivacyTests is Brave Browser's Senior Research and Privacy Engineer, Arthur Edelstein.

You wouldn't know this unless you looked through multiple pages on multiple sites, especially when his coworker doesn't disclose this when praising his website, but it's worth noting.

[–] Sophocles@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago

Littetally. I found it fishy that Brave suspiciously scored so well. Half of those browsers are just modified Chromium anyway including Brave, and Brave has made some suspicious marketing decisions which is why I dont really trust them. If you're curious look into their history involving crypto and advertising.

The only good ones I'd recomend are Librewolf, Mullvad Browser, and Tor. They're really the only ones that even try to combat fingerprinting.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks, I'll edit the title

[–] kat@orbi.camp 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yep, written before Mozilla's latest move, and doesn't even mention EFF's Cover Your Tracks or CreepJS for fingerprint testing. Just some vague descriptor of "Browser Privacy Test", which they have provided no links or details on.

They also just claim Tor is the penultimate privacy browser, when it isn't. Doesn't even mention that exit nodes around the whole world can be run by anyone, including 3-letter agencies and bad actors. I don't trust the testing of whoever this is, seems kinda lazy and doesn't cover all the angles that need to be covered when it comes to browsers.

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably, do you have a more updated resource?

[–] Shyze3D@feddit.nl 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Neat, thanks, added to the OP

The downside is that Waterfox is based on Firefox ESR (Extended Support Release) builds, rather than the main Firefox branch.

ESR builds are actually less secure than regular Firefox because they receive security updates more slowly.

How accurate is this, exactly? I was under the impression that Firefox ESR is akin to something like the LTS Linux kernel. That is to say, sure, it doesn't receive fancy new features as soon as they release, but surely it still receives important security updates in a timely manner.