this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
1535 points (96.9% liked)

Science Memes

13184 readers
848 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1535
nets (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Obelix@feddit.org 173 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Just FYI:

Single-use plastic products are used once, or for a short period of time, before being thrown away. Under the EU’s rules on single-use plastics, the EU is tackling the 10 single-use plastic items most commonly found on Europe’s beaches and is promoting sustainable alternatives. The 10 items are

Cotton bud sticks 
Cutlery, plates, straws and stirrers 
Balloons and sticks for balloons 
Food containers 
Cups for beverages 
Beverage containers 
Cigarette butts 
Plastic bags 
Packets and wrappers 
Wet wipes and sanitary items 

https://commission.europa.eu/news/less-plastic-waste-means-cleaner-beaches-2024-08-14_en

So yeah, nets are bad, but straws, plastic bags, cigarettes and packages are also a problem.

[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 72 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People want to pretend just the things that are convenient to them are an issue. They say government and companies need to take action, then complain about actions taken. It's really wild to see.

[–] Azteh@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Not throwing my garbage in the wild makes me have no idea how often straws end up in the ocean, so it seemed like a wild thing to go after.

Any idea if it's people dumping all this stuff in the wild or if it's because we throw it out in our bins that it somehow gets to the ocean?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 week ago

a lot of single-use items come from fast food places, which people will eat in their cars and then just throw out the window as they drive along.

it's a fucking sad practice but it's really hard to get people to stop doing it, so the next best option is just to make sure as much as possible of the things you get from fast food joints will dissolve in a rain shower.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 16 points 1 week ago

Stuff falls out of garbage trucks, trash cans get tipped over, stuff gets blown out of the bed of a dumptruck at the landfill, landfills erode and take trash with them. Trashcans aren't just magic portals that take trash into the nightosphere

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jtotheb@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

This is a list of end-consumer items put together by a government body beholden to fishing and other industries. And it’s not even about pollution levels, it’s specifically about beach pollution. Plastic lids on cartons of heavy cream are “also a problem” if we focus only on reducing plastic waste in the kitchen, but implying it’s even relevant compared to industrial plastic waste is disingenuous

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 143 points 1 week ago (4 children)
[–] FMT99@lemmy.world 87 points 1 week ago

No, someone else is doing something worse than me so I'm absolved. I can do what I want.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, I simultaneously want to comment that the left panels are a wild fantasy, as I've never seen an actual human say that we should focus on plastic straws. As far as I can tell, that's propaganda put into the world by companies trying to discredit genuine efforts.

But at the same time, it's not even like you have to focus on straws. You can simply not use them, because it is just a stupid concept to produce something that's immediately trash, and then also go and do other things in life. Believe it or not, most activities in life don't involve straws.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 94 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Plastic Recycling is Largely A Myth.

The world produces an average of 430 million metric tons of plastic each year. The United States alone produces tens of millions of tons of plastic waste annually. Yet on average, only about 5 to 6 percent of plastic in the U.S. is recycled.

Basically, the vast majority of plastic either literally cannot be recycled, at all, or would be astoundingly expensive to properly seperate according to it's different types and run through the recycling process.

... So, in most cases, it isn't, and just ends up in a landfill or being directly dumped into nature.

Oil companies have known this for decades, and, as with other issues surrounding pollution ... they've promoted anything that makes an individual feel guilty when they know that even if all individuals followed the suggested course of action, it would have a negligible impact.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

From my understanding, this is basically the case for all recycling aside from aluminum and glass

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

Oil companies have known this for decades,

fun fact: BP created the carbon footprint to turn the guilt onto the end consumers, and away from them.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] HungryJerboa@lemmy.ca 70 points 1 week ago (4 children)

But aside from donating to NGOs dedicated to cleaning up ocean litter, the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water. It requires lifting fishermen out of poverty, teaching them more sustainable fishing practices, and cracking down on littering, all things that require international cooperation.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 89 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It requires lifting fishermen out of poverty

Bruh. These aren't 1 dude in a boat with a long line. These are billion dollar corporations running fleets. And yes, we need international cooperation to bring them to heel. Like with farmers, however, make no mistake that the people doing this kind of pollution are at all ignorant or unaware of what they are doing.

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Even the adrenaline junkies on Deadliest Catch are running multiple million dollar businesses

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (18 children)

the average person has very little way to reduce the number of plastic nets in the water

Besides the obvious and 100% viable option of just not eating fish.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

The average person cannot make the connection between the food they eat and the animal it was. People act so appalled by the torturous conditions in animal farms, and then stop at McDonald's on their lunch break to pick up some chicken nuggets, totally unaware of the irony

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Now I feel better about my weird dietary preferences.

I'm doing my part!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Or organise a boycott on eating fish.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

You could go the rest of your life without eating another fish and you would be fine.

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On an unrelated notes, a huge fraction of oceanic microplastics is from car tyres. Driving is a number one source of oceanic microplastic.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 36 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Car tyres are also significant contributors to terrestial microplastics and particulate matter!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 45 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I am all for minimizing/eliminating single use plastics. But when i get served a milkshake in a plastic mug, with a plastic lid, and a plastic spoon, but a paper straw because of "save the sea"...

i just wish we used our brains more.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What if dispenser machines had a pay by volume model? You bring your own thing, they fill it, and charge you by how much you use. Would probably need something added to measure flow and set prices, but it's not like a McDonalds built in the 70s is still using exactly the same machines they were back then.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] x00z@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (36 children)

Just stop eating fish.

No need for nets.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago (9 children)

stop eating all animals tbh.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The worst thing about paper straws is seeing it poked through a plastic lid.

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Noticed the same thing, how can one be concerned about the plastic straws but not the cups? I almost thought that was the joke.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

to be fair that was a regulator decision. they seem to have went for the low hanging fruit of something relatively easy to replace without impacting the bottom line.

not gonna save the world by a long shot, but its a better than nothing sort of deal im surprised they even bothered with in the first place.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My conspiracy theory is it was chosen to deliberately harm the optics of environmentalists. Something with minimal useful impact and maximum inconvenience would turn people against the whole idea of environmentally friendly alternatives.

[–] syreus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

I see a lot of people who share your opinion. I used to work rehabbing sea turtles and EVERY turtle we received alive or dead had straws/bags in their gut. It might not seem super important but those products look more like jellyfish and turtles have poor eyesight.

The nets commercial fishing boats make the most plastic waste by a lot but declining a plastic straw and bringing your own bag to shop WILL save a life.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rainerloeten@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Getting rid of plastic straws, but not cups and lids was such a stupid thing. There are substitutes for cups, but they cost more, so they weren't a good option for greenwashing.

If you're already minimizing seafood intake because of the lead content, you're already minimizing your personal impact of fishing net use. What we need to do is legislate the use of hemp nets. Hemp was the primary net maternal before the oil industry put their weight behind making hemp illegal under the guise of "The War On Drugs!" and made plastic/nylon nets the default.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

That would be ideal, but each person has limited time and attention. Advocate for both, but put your efforts into figuring out how to change the thing with the larger impact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alottachairs@beehaw.org 12 points 1 week ago

Maybe stop killing fish and fish will not die as much

load more comments