this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
412 points (98.4% liked)

politics

20576 readers
3933 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/26024422

Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC's former chief of staff, thinks the Democrats need a bolder vision.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 61 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Why the fuck is this ghoul still running in the first place? Please primary her ass CA.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (4 children)

You think too much of CA. CA is INCREDIBLY liberal, so much of CA loves her and worships the memory of Dianne Feinstein.

[–] InvictusUmbra1824@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Trump got 38% of California to vote for him last year. We are nowhere close to “incredibly liberal”. Also I hate Pelosi.

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Undereducated people who can't stand the cognitive dissonance of the liberal control of CA, paying lip service to issues that actually affect the working class while enriching the elites, restricting freedom and protecting the stability of the status quo above all.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RufusFirefly@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

I have family and friends in California. They all thought Feinstein was way too freaking old.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 50 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Term and age limits will be needed if the Constitution is improved, alongside ditching first-past-the-post voting. A great deal of America's rot comes from the stagnation caused by career politicians who simply exist to occupy a seat.

Sure, we might lose 'wise' leaders, but it has become pretty damn clear that archaic politicians are the plugged toilets of Democracy. All they do is cause a mess if not promptly handled. The Geronocrats must go.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

It comes from citizens united as well. We are a country whose government runs on bribe money and little else.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago (13 children)

Fuck yes, let's go with it!

  • Politician age range 30-50
  • Background check
  • Minimum Education Requirements
  • Understands science (including biology) and technology thoroughly at minimum high school level
  • 200 hours of community service working with the poor
  • 200 hours of community service working with the elderly
  • 200 hours of community service working with immigrants
  • Debt, Funding and Corporate Alliance check
  • Blocked from stock market trades along with immediate family
  • No bribes
  • No Lobbying
  • No ex C-STAFF for major companies.
  • Paid enough to be single yacht and a summer home kind of rich.

What else we need in here or what have I gone wrong on?

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I have no issue with politicians up to age 65, if we want to capture the breadth of their experience. After 65 though, they're out. Cognitive decline is a sharp dropoff, and we want politicians who are a going concern for the decisions they make.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The fact that this would've put Bernie out of a job years ago is a hard no for me. Campaign finance reform so we don't have a bunch of corporate stooges in power, and getting rid of FPTP make more sense to me. Better alternative candidates will have a chance, as well as life-ling civil servants who are proven and lovee by their communities

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A neat person like Bernie doesn't have to be a politician to do good works. He can help mentor grass root organizations. While it would be a shame to lose a good guy from direct politics, it is far easier for evil politicians to stick around if we don't force them out. A good guy is apt to step down from power when they think it is right, but an evil one? They won't leave until carried out in a coffin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Back when Pelosi was pushing the Affordable Care Act she came on KQED and railroaded the host, basically just ignored all the questions to deliver the party line. I was bruh this is your home base and acted like it was hostile territory.

Pelosi has been a huge fundraiser and leader for the Democrats, but might as well live on planet Mars when it comes to understanding working class people, even in the Bay Area.

We need a leadership vacuum in the Democratic Party to even hope of changing anything significantly.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Pelosi has been a huge fundraiser and leader for the Democrats

One reason why Cori Bush and Jamal Bowman got the old heave-ho. Pelosi has been instrumental in bankrolling Congressfolk like Henry Cuellar and Richie Torries while undermining candidates like Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar. Her leadership has largely lead to the current moment in Democratic Party Politics, with a handful of insiders growing obscenely rich while the rank-and-file voters are told to suck eggs every time their favorite legislation fails.

We need a leadership vacuum in the Democratic Party to even hope of changing anything significantly.

The real leadership of the democratic party is within the donor class. Women like Nancy get to hold the gavel, but its the Gettys and the Buffets and the Thiels who ultimately hold the power.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 82 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Saikat Chakrabarti, AOC’s former chief of staff, thinks the Democrats need a bolder vision.

Fuck yes they do!

[–] Toto@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

The message that could be sent by a champagne to kick NP out could start a left wing movement.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 69 points 6 days ago (12 children)

“I’ve got some news: I’ve decided to run against Nancy Pelosi to represent San Francisco in Congress. I know some of you might be surprised that Speaker Emeritus Pelosi is running again, but she is—for her 21st term!” Chakrabarti’s post read.

I fucking hate boomers in political office. They refuse to let go of the reins. They want to hold on until death. Selfish.

I saw a video last year asking people in the UK about USA politics and someone commented how old our leaders are.

[–] limer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I think she is too old to be a boomer, that generation was 1946 to 1964. She was born 1940

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago

Yeah, she's Silent Generation, same as Biden.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago

This strengthens the point being made though

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@lemm.ee 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

All these fucking useless Democratic leaders are so selfish. You've failed and failed over and over again, miserably, yet you still insist on trying to lead? Do the right thing. Step down. Quit. It's truly disgusting how they've strangled their party and country with their incompetence.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 6 days ago

And let progressives who actually have plans to stop Trump win for once? Never!

[–] RufusFirefly@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

She going to be another Feinstein?

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 32 points 6 days ago

Kick her the fuck out. Kick all the useless democrats out. Fuck all of them. They lost. They're done. Go the fuck away.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 42 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The Democrats need a vision, period.

[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

Vision? How about we start with a pulse?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Surprising New Primary Challenger

That's not that surprising. I was hoping it was like a golden retriever or something.

[–] therizzo@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Natural progression of the Air Bud series.

[–] Zarxrax@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Nothing in the Constitution says a dog can't be speaker of the house!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 9 points 5 days ago

Clickbait is not including the name in the post title.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

... is it Father Time?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's not surprising. The left has been looking for someone capable of primarying her for years.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 6 days ago

And for years she's always held onto her position because of name recognition and money from Super PACs. Ratfucking is a bipartisan tool.

[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Good.

Much like the appeasers that enabled Hitler, history is going to look back on Pelosi, Schumer, Kamala, Biden, Obama, Clinton, Jefferies, and other democrats who stood by and let all this happen on their watch without so much as a wimper.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] satans_methpipe@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fucking ghoul looks cel shaded.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Borderlands 4 villian confirmed.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 days ago

The challengers we need are to the entire DNC. They are a failure at representative government

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›