this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
1150 points (97.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

10375 readers
1505 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

but then where should the rich people go golfing?

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] karpintero@lemmy.world 165 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Let's also get rid of golf courses in arid deserts in the midst of droughts

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 143 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You had me at "Let’s get rid of golf courses"

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 48 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

This is a municipal course as well, so Seattle could literally do this. The city government doesn't want to.

This heavily neglected sidewalk, next to the fenced off golf course, alongside a high speed and very busy highway onramp just 2 blocks from a light rail stop, tells you just how much the city cares about the area.

There is no excuse not to cleanup and widen this sidewalk except apathy and malaise from the city.

[–] The_Caretaker@urbanists.social 3 points 22 hours ago

@mosiacmango @PugJesus
My wire cutters, pipe cutters and bolt cutters are cheaper than your fence.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That lady is Seattle personified.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (5 children)

A fairly generic lady and that’s what you took from that guy’s comment?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 93 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You're probably not going to save 95% of the trees given the major earthworks likely needed for managing sewage, stormwater, and other utilities. You'll probably save most of them, though.

40k looks pretty optimistic for the size and number of buildings, too.

[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

probably not going to save 95% of the trees

I was wondering that too... maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 33 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago

I supposed they meant "And this amount of space is still available for greenery" rather than "These, specific, trees will be preserved"

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Depends how many floors they have but yeah, that would be quite high density at 60k/km²

[–] index@sh.itjust.works 0 points 15 hours ago

I don't know if it's the same in USA but with all these new regulations building houses these days is an environmental disaster

[–] urata@lemmy.world 37 points 23 hours ago

I work at a golf course and I'd rather be doing something meaningful like building homes so this post speaks to me directly.

Unfortunately the big thing lately is we've been dropping a bunch of trees.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.org 11 points 19 hours ago

Now add in mixed use zoning, and affordable housing units and this could be a winner

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you just repurpose for housing you just wind up with 40,000 people needing transit and overloading the system you're trying to promote.

We need to think beyond housing and towards having communities that largely provide the needs of the people living with them. Shops, offices, other non-office/shop jobs, and recreational activities need to be considered as well.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

The neat part is that businesses can be in the bottom couple of floors. Though often this doesn't seem to be done unless it's the CBD...

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

BuT wHeRe WouLd i PaRk mY cAr?!?!!?

[–] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the neat part, you don't.

[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

car
car go
car go bye
cargo bike

[–] puppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 23 hours ago

if I saw this on a billboard/poster I'd have a new bike

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Truly the poet of our generation 🥲

[–] fnrir@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 23 hours ago

In the water hazard on the 14th hole.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 13 points 23 hours ago

Plus you can live in a pentagon! Just not the Pentagon.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago

When there's no more golf you'll know the rich fucks are gone.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Most suburban streets are 50 feet wide, many suburban front yards are 50 feet deep. That's a wasted space 150 feet wide and however long the street is long. Think of how much housing could be built in that space if you tore up that road, and in its place put a pair of alleyways housing in the middle

[–] ChokingHazard@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I would argue closer to 30, unless you’re including all the easement and sidewalks?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I did some measuring on Google Earth and the distance from sidewalk (or on roads without a sidewalk from the road) to the front of houses in a major city nearish to me and found a few neighborhoods 50 feet to the house was about the standard. They also had 50 foot deep backyards!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] admin@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Good luck with the NIMBYs. Or NIMFYs now I guess?

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 12 hours ago

Oh yeah it would never actually happen but a person can dream, right?

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

That area should hold about 400 people, not 40,000. The trees won't survive unless they can see the sky.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not for nothing, but this wouldn't fly in the USA. You'd need to replace most of those trees with roads.

Or better yet, reduce the number of housing units and keep the trees.

[–] navi@lemmy.tespia.org 6 points 1 day ago

This is Seattle btw, but I think the meme is that it won't fly.

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if we just altered zoning laws so they don't restrict high-density residential buildings?

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh, they didn't change that, people living there need to get real good at dodging golf balls.

[–] otto@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Keeping all of the trees while also building a 40,000 unit apartment building on the same lot is gonna be a bit of a trick. Unless the building is 30 stories high. That might be normal in New York, but that’s not something you’re gonna see very much outside of the city.

I’m all for vertical city building, but keep in mind what is likely to happen in your local community.

load more comments (2 replies)

But where would we play golf?

[–] don@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah but then rich fucks wouldn’t have a place all to themselves to be rich fucks, so that’s a fuck you, poors, just be rich like us, thanks.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess that technically counts as a public sex forest then

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›