this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
335 points (99.7% liked)

News

25290 readers
3728 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

The General Services Administration (GSA) is removing all EV chargers from federal properties, citing that they are “not mission-critical.”

The move aligns with Trump’s broader rollback of green energy initiatives, including efforts to override California’s EV mandates.

The GSA will also phase out electric vehicles purchased under the Biden administration. Critics see this as part of a broader GOP effort against clean energy.

The decision comes as Trump also pauses $3 billion in public EV charger funding.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They will be replaced with nothing but Tesla chargers…and the maga fucks will call it a victory.

[–] Tezzerets_Tea_Time@lemmy.world 52 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But wasting money removing something already paid for and done, that employees rely on and costs basically nothing, is "mission critical?" Idk. Seems kinda... Inefficient.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 17 points 18 hours ago

Being a petty ass bitch isn't about efficiency.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 9 points 15 hours ago

Well this is gonna hurt Tesla’s stock more

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago

So Tesla's are not missing critical? How does that work?

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 157 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Why even remove them? Sell or lease them to a company that maintains them.

Malicious, vindictive bullshit. That’s what this is.

[–] tyrant@lemmy.world 92 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Also a waste of taxpayer dollars.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

Better get DOGE on it!!! 🥴

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Same reason why Reagan ripped the White House's solar panels out that Carter had installed.

The GOP is a party of hate and spite to disguise stealing money to give to the wealthy.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Here's the thing very few liberals will understand: Republicans do this performative dance to waste government money and remove things like EV chargers and solar panels because, and I cannot emphasize this enough...

it appeases and even excites their base.

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Doing shit like this shows their base that their team is in charge. That's it. They could have let them stay in and their base wouldn't have been the wiser. But doing it shows them that their team won.

Liberals don't have a similar signal. Hell, I didn't even know the GSA installed them. Not only that but liberals don't care as much to "win" like this.

We just want to survive whereas conservatives want to oppress.

That's the difference.

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

I mean it's just easier to call the fuckers Nazis, because they are Nazis

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago

Regan is a monster, that was at least while the roof was being resurfaced and they just didn't put them back. They were just water heaters anyway, not photovoltaics.

This is solely spending more money to remove freshly installed government equipment for no reason.

[–] painfulasterisk1@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

How else will they blame the next administration of wasting taxpayer's dollars by reinstalling them back again?

[–] hark@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Like when reagan had the solar panels removed off the white house.

[–] Cocopanda@futurology.today 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They simply can charge more for electricity and make a profit if it’s so bad for them to have been installed. This is a massive waste of resources. Just F off MAGA. Go suck more Saudi oil up your arse.

[–] tomi000@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

They dont want an efficient solution. They want big oil bribes.

[–] Narauko@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

This very much annoys me. I am a left leaning libertarian (so probably considered Center Right), and this is stupid. Waste of money and labor. I am not really for the EV mandates because I respect a free market. But oil is heavily subsidized and thus not a free market, so charging infrastructure should get the same benefit to allow consumers to decide what works best for them. If low energy prices are a priority as their lip service indicates, then all forms should be treated equally. Government doesn't get decide winners and losers. Lobbying is corruption.

I love my plug in hybrid. I would love to be able to charge at work. I also love gas and diesel, but I want to see where hydrogen and other cleaner combustion options can go for environmental reasons. Level playing fields is the main reason for Governments to exist.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 43 points 1 day ago

Because scrapping existing things just because they're not a throwback to the old gas guzzler days is surely going to save money and make things great again.

I'm kind of waiting for him to throw out a maximum fuel efficiency standard. You know, get them back to the good ol days of the 1970s 8/mpg Lincoln that weigh 2 tons.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I read that when Puttler increased his recent little tantrum in Ukraine there was an obvious shortage of petrol, but EVs could still get power which makes them a very good option to have in case of emergency.

Alternatives energy sources are good.

They could just have turned off power, but I guess they'll argue that then people would be able to steal the chargers, so it is better to sell them to their friend for a steep discount since they are used.

Then when the political climate shifts on the issue, they can just buy new expensive chargers from their other friend!

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago

The chargers themselves aren't super expensive in the grand scheme of the project. It's the prep and grounds work that's expensive... You're on the right track, just a little off.

What they do is give the removal contract to their friend who inflates the cost, that's the real money.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hmm, I wonder if President Musk will veto this one....

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah. The chargers are likely not NACS

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Aren't they all supposed to migrate to NACS eventually? They could have said "we're gonna give the contract for EV chargers for all Federal buildings to Tesla" instead.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

I think you’d have to go through a bidding process and public comment period. /me shrugs

EVs are stupid anyway. We should just make enthusiast cars that are fun to drive with toll “roads” to race on like Germany, and then build public transportation while removing road lanes until there’s only enough for service vehicles.

We need infrastructure that makes sense. EVs only help car companies

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Something tells me Elon gets to keep his though.

[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

The image shows tesla chargers, but we know it wasn't tesla chargers that were removed... Tesla needs its monopoly! 3rd party were starting to make a dent in its profits!

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

You know who I don't like? That Trump dude.

He seems like such a buffalo humper. And I can't stand anyone who humps buffalo.

trump kneeling to his oil-conglomerate-owning masters. Fucking pathetic.