this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1804 readers
78 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Deep Research is the AI slop of academia — low-quality research-slop built for people that don't really care about quality or substance, and it’s not immediately obvious who it’s for.

it's weird that Ed stops there, since answer almost writes itself. ludic had a bit about how in companies bigger than three guys in a shed, people who sign software contracts don't use that software in any normal way;

The idea of going into something knowing about it well enough to make sure the researcher didn't fuck something up is kind of counter to the point of research itself.

conversely, if you have no idea what are you doing, you won't be able to tell if machine generated noise is in any way relevant or true

The whole point of hiring a researcher is that you can rely on their research, that they're doing work for you that would otherwise take you hours.

but but, this lying machine can output something in minutes so this bullshit generator obviously makes human researchers obsolete. this is not for academia because it's utterly unsuitable and google scholar beats it badly anyway; this is not for wide adoption because it's nowhere near free tier; this is for idea guys who have enough money to shell out $whatever monthly subscription and prefer to set a couple hundred of dollars on fire instead of hiring a researcher/scientist/contractor. especially keeping in mind that contractor might tell them something they don't want to hear, but this lmgtfy x lying box (but worse, because it pulls lots of seo spam) won't

OpenAI's next big thing is the ability to generate a report that you would likely not be able to use in any meaningful way anywhere, because while it can browse the web and find things and write a report, it sources things based on what it thinks can confirm its arguments rather than making sure the source material is valid or respectable.

e: this is also insidious and potent ~~attack surface~~ marketing opportunity against clueless monied people who trust these slop machines for some reason. and it might be exploitable by tuning seo just right

[–] HotGarbage@awful.systems 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago

116 million

There’s no way that what they’re buying is worth that much.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I've been listening to faster and worse (see https://awful.systems/comment/6216748 ) and I like it so I wanted to give it ups.

(I think this and the memory palace are the only micro podcasts I've listened to. idk why it isn't a more common format)

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

thanks! It might be uncommon because it's a real pain in the ass to keep it short. Every time I make one I stress about how easily my point can be misunderstood because there are so few details. Good way to practice the art of moving on

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if it's any reassurance, i've understood all your points perfectly! you're basically making an argument for all UI to be more apple-like

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

holy shit, I really don't know if this is real or a joke

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

really, thanks for listening! It's fun making them and nice to know they are being listened to

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

this is also why pivot to AI is mostly 200-250 words, not 1200 or 2000 or 8000

[–] fasterandworse@awful.systems 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's probably more sensible for me to try writing short bits too, instead of faffing around with videos

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Amazon Prime pulling some AI bullshit with, considering the bank robbery in the movie was to pay for surgery for a trans woman, a hint of transphobia (or more likely, not a hint, just the full reason).

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The most naked attempt yet at allowing billionaires to live on without the rest of us.

What infuriates me the most, for some reason, is how nobody seems to care that the robots leave the fridge door open for so long. I guess it's some form of solace that, even with the resources and tech to live on without us the billionaires still don't understand ecosystems or ecology. Waste energy training a machine to do the same thing a human can do but slower and more wastefully, just so you can order the machine around without worrying about it's feelings... I call this some form of solace as it means, even if they do away with us plebs, climate change will get'em as well - and whatever remaining life on Earth will be able to take a breather for the first time in centuries.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlueMonday1984@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

In other news, Brian Merchant's going full-time on Blood in the Machine.

Did notice a passage in the annoucement which caught my eye:

Meanwhile, the Valley has doubled down on a grow-at-all-costs approach to AI, sinking hundreds of billions into a technology that will automate millions of jobs if it works, might kneecap the economy if it doesn’t, and will coat the internet in slop and misinformation either way.

I'm not sure if its just me, but it strikes me as telling about how AI's changed the cultural zeitgeist that Merchant's happily presenting automation as a bad thing without getting backlash (at least in this context).

[–] jonhendry@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago

will automate millions of jobs if it works, might kneecap the economy

will kneecap the economy if it works, too. Because companies certainly aren't going to keep people employed in those millions of jobs.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] nightsky@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (16 children)

Interesting slides: Peter Gutmann - Why Quantum Cryptanalysis is Bollocks

Since quantum computers are far outside my expertise, I didn't realize how far-fetched it currently is to factor large numbers with quantum computers. I already knew it's not near-future stuff for practical attacks on e.g. real-world RSA keys, but I didn't know it's still that theoretical. (Although of course I lack the knowledge to assess whether that presentation is correct in its claims.)

But also, while reading it, I kept thinking how many of the broader points it makes also apply to the AI hype... (for example, the unfounded belief that game-changing breakthroughs will happen soon).

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] swlabr@awful.systems 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

TIL musk has a nobel peace prize nomination for this year

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›