this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1242 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

34977 readers
95 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what's going on.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DragonAce@lemmy.world 307 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

That man is repeatedly showing the world how stupid he actually is and how little he actually understands about running a company. He has never been in a situation like this where he wasn't surrounded by a bunch of people playing babysitter and doing all the leg work to try to actually get his shit ideas to work. IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn't even figured out what to call tweets and retweets, he really hadn't thought any further than changing the logo and repeating the same lame idea he had 30 years ago.

ABAM (All Billionaires Are Morons)

[–] pulaskiwasright@lemmy.ml 121 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or all billionaires are scum who have written the laws and ensured that the fine for this is no more than an annoyance and removing the sign without a permit was a worthwhile risk and the right call to make.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This guy gets it.

I think "all billionaires are scum" is perhaps too harsh, but it's far closer to the truth than the views of society at large.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You cannot become a billionaire without being a scummy person.

[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Rowling became a billionaire by writing popular books and selling the movie rights. She's a scummy person, obviously, but she didn't become rich by being one.

[–] priapus@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Yeah you definitely can become a billionaire without being a scummy person, just not trough business. You need to be an artist or athlete.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Too harsh? Can you name one that isn't?

[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure that future billionaire me seems like a cool guy, I'm totally not biased.

Eat the rich, except if I become rich, then I'm exempt because I am a honorary proletariat

/s but seriously tho, if anyone becomes a billionaire, they'll soon get corrupted by the wealth

[–] NewDark@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You don't become a billionaire without exploiting so many people and then hording those riches to yourself. You've already been corrupted by that point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DrJenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think for most people, they become an asshole on the way to becoming a billionaire. You don't make that kind of money without exploitation and plundering. The only exception I could think of would be if they inherited the money. And even so, if you inherit that kind of money and don't give out a good chunk of it, you're still scum imo.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

IIRC I saw somewhere this morning that he hadn’t even figured out what to call tweets and retweets

Obviously Tweet -> Xeet 💩

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.ml 119 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The miniseries on Twitter's collapse is going to be epic.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope someone to graffiti “Los” in front of that “er”

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

Best part is that the LEDs for “twit” now shine really bright at night.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chokidar@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To anyone interested about what's really like to deal with this man, I highly recommend giving this a read: https://www.tumblr.com/numberonecatwinner/701567544684855296/elon-wyd

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There are multiple stories like that from several people.

Apparently there were people at Tesla who were effectively employed to get fired when he was in one of his moods.

And if you read enough of the stories it all comes down to basically a single PA who kept him away from important things. And that person stopped working for him shortly before the public realized what an asshole he is.


And after learning that, I can't stop wondering who they work for now... And I want to see a show based on their biography.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Man, I was strangely impressed with Tumblr these days until I scrolled two.posts down and it froze me out because I wasn't signed in

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Police actually stopped a rich guy from doing something illegal?

[–] N0body@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He didn't pay for a permit to do so. The police are there to protect capital, but under clearly-defined rules. Anyone who isn't a fuckwit knows to pay the city its fees before doing something like this.

When JPMorgan Chase buys out a smaller bank, they apply for the permit in triplicate and pay all the fees, then make a donation to the Fraternal Order of Police. The cops then show up to attack protestors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fiat_lux@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we now start pronouncing X as 'errrr' when referring to the company? It would be good not to taint the good name of the letter entirely.

And it does say 'er' on the side of not-his-building.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I call it Xitter, using the Chinese pronunciation of Xi.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh man can you imagine how great this would be if they got hit with a 3 day eviction notice for damaging the property?

That would be so fucking funny

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They haven't been paying their rent anyways, so I'm not sure why they bothered to change the sign.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HeavenAndHell@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

I am genuinely baffled at how anyone still thinks Musk is even remotely competent. There's absolutely no way he's running all of these companies by himself.

[–] Johem@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

This has to be false. If only 'er' remained, the 'Twitt' would have been removed. But the twit is still in charge.

[–] RandomLemming@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 year ago

Honestly, this is a comedy that needs to be seen to be believed.

[–] nortorc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Not that it isn't fun to laugh at what a boondoggle ~~Twitter~~ X is, but why do you need a permit to change a sign on a building?

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Guessing less about the sign itself and more about the heavy equipment/traffic obstruction involved in getting it down.

[–] venusenvy47@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Also possibly becathe doesn't own the building and needs approval of the owner.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] neptune@dmv.social 18 points 1 year ago

Need to make sure a qualified contractor does the work, that the sidewalk is roped off, and that other construction on the same road isn't happening. Pretty typical stuff.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] liontigerwings@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I read that they had permission from the city but the landlord themselves didn't approve it.

[–] Granite@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago

I wonder why the landlord who has been stiffed repeatedly wouldn’t sign off. Hmm…

[–] techno156@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Slight shame that the contractors didn't start from the end. It could have been funnier if they had taken off the "er" instead.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] victron@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Mf can't stop taking Ls

[–] popemichael@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

To er is to be Musk

load more comments
view more: next ›