this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
-31 points (25.4% liked)

Technology

62853 readers
4228 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 25 points 4 days ago (2 children)

These are not real people, it’s just a machine telling you what you want to hear. That’s all.

It’s not real, it’s not human.

Go outside and touch some grass and make a real human connection.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

If only people would do that, but I bet that advice is just like telling an overweight person to stop eating.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I mean, video games aren't real either. I played a round of Steel Division 2 earlier today. It was fun, but it didn't really accomplish anything. The tanks and people there weren't real -- they were just renditions of a computer-rendered world. I don't think that most people are going to go off on video games as being simply virtual, though.

I wouldn't personally use the term "boyfriend" or "girlfriend". They're fancy chatbots. But I don't think that there's anything intrinsically problematic with them. The big issue, from my standpont, is if it causes people to not go out and have kids because the chatbot is taking the place of a partner, exploiting a useful biological imperative -- that's got broader societal effects.

It sounds like in this case, the author is a woman who is a divorcee who was mostly looking for entertainment, not a spouse. So...shrugs

I mean, if she went out and read some romance novels and fantasized, would that be preferable to a chatbot? That'd be more of a traditional route, maybe. But is one clearly worse than the other?

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

Meh, with a little bit of effort you could probably get a hand job for that.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

They could have watched the movie Her for much less

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago

So the movie Her is reality now?